Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770985›Full record

SynthesisBMC urology2020

Prevalence of microhematuria in renal colic and urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bruno Minotti, Giorgio Treglia, Mariarosa Pascale, Samuele Ceruti, Laura Cantini, Luciano Anselmi, Andrea Saporito

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Imaging of acute pelvic pain.The British journal of radiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bruno MinottiEmergency Department, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacher Strasse 95, CH-9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland. bruno.minotti@kssg.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-9968
Giorgio TregliaHeath Technology Assessment Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Mariarosa PascaleClinical Trial Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Samuele CerutiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Clinica Luganese, Lugano, Switzerland.
Laura CantiniDepartment of Anesthesia, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Luciano AnselmiDepartment of Anesthesia, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Andrea SaporitoDepartment of Anesthesia, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Ospedale San Giovanni Bellinzona · CHEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale · CHClinica Luganese Moncucco · CHUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the prevalence of microhematuria in patients presenting with suspected acute renal colic and/or confirmed urolithiasis at the emergency department.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted to find relevant data on prevalence of microhematuria in patients with suspected acute renal colic and/or confirmed urolithiasis. Data from each study regarding study design, patient characteristics and prevalence of microhematuria were retrieved. A random effect-model was used for the pooled analyses.

resultsForty-nine articles including 15'860 patients were selected through the literature search. The pooled microhematuria prevalence was 77% (95%CI: 73-80%) and 84% (95%CI: 80-87%) for suspected acute renal colic and confirmed urolithiasis, respectively. This proportion was much higher when the dipstick was used as diagnostic test (80 and 90% for acute renal colic and urolithiasis, respectively) compared to the microscopic urinalysis (74 and 78% for acute renal colic and urolithiasis, respectively).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis revealed a high prevalence of microhematuria in patients with acute renal colic (77%), including those with confirmed urolithiasis (84%). Intending this prevalence as sensitivity, we reached moderate values, which make microhematuria alone a poor diagnostic test for acute renal colic or urolithiasis. Microhematuria could possibly still important to assess the risk in patients with renal colic.

Indexed as

HematuriaHumansPrevalenceRenal ColicUrolithiasisMicrohematuriaRenal colicStone scoreUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID32770985
PMCPMC7414650
OpenAlexW3047891907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.