Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770947›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Interaction of chorioamnionitis at term with maternal, fetal and obstetrical factors as predictors of neonatal mortality: a population-based cohort study.

Dina Zaki, Jaques Balayla, Marc Beltempo, Guillaume Gazil, Anne Monique Nuyt, Isabelle Boucoiran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Establishment of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of early-onset sepsis in very preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dina ZakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, 3175 Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.
Jaques BalaylaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Marc BeltempoDepartment of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Guillaume GazilApplied Clinical Research Unit (URCA), Centre de recherche du CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anne Monique NuytDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Isabelle BoucoiranDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, 3175 Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada. isabelle.boucoiran@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-6024
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChorioamnionitis is a frequent complication of pregnancy and is known to be associated with serious adverse post-natal outcomes including death. However, the assessment of fetal well-being in labor in the context of chorioamnionitis is often challenging because of fetal tachycardia. Identifying specific risk factors for adverse neonatal outcomes in the context of chorioamnionitis could therefore be of paramount importance. This study aimed to determine if maternal and fetal risk factors for increased neonatal mortality and early neonatal mortality are modified in the context of chorioamnionitis in term pregnancies.

methodsA retrospective population-based cohort study using the United States birth/infant death public file from 2011 to 2013 was performed, including all live births at 37 weeks gestation and beyond. Interaction between chorioamnionitis and maternal demographic variables as well as labor and delivery potential risk factors were analyzed for association with neonatal death (< 28 days) and early neonatal death (< 7 days) using multivariate logistic regressions.

resultsAmong 9,034,428 live births, the prevalence of chorioamionitis was 1.29% (95% CI 1.28-1.30%). The incidence of neonatal death and early neonatal death were 0.09 and 0.06% in the chorioamnionitis group versus 0.06 and 0.04% in the no chorioamnionitis group (p = 0.0003 and < 0.0001), respectively. Smoking was significantly associated with neonatal death and early neonatal death in the context of chorioamnionitis (OR 2.44, CI:1.34-4.43/ 2.36 CI:1.11-5.01) but was either less strongly or not associated in the absence of chorioamnionitis (OR 1.24, CI:1.14-1.35/0.93, CI:0.82-1.05). The association between gestational age (37 weeks compared to 39 weeks) and neonatal death was more important in the context of chorioamnionitis (OR = 3.19, CI: 1.75-5.82 versus 1.63, CI: 1.49-1.79). Multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors for neonatal death and/or early neonatal death: low maternal education, extreme maternal age, obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m

conclusionsSmoking as well as early term have a positive interaction with chorioamnionitis for the risk of neonatal mortality. This should be taken into account when counseling pregnant women and managing laboring pregnant women with suspected chorioamnionitis.

Indexed as

AdultChorioamnionitisCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePerinatal DeathPregnancyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited StatesYoung AdultChorioamnionitisEarly termNeonatal deathSmoking

Identifiers

PMID32770947
PMCPMC7414575
OpenAlexW3047971264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.