Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770867›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2020

Unbiased corneal tissue analysis using Gabor-domain optical coherence microscopy and machine learning for automatic segmentation of corneal endothelial cells.

Cristina Canavesi, Andrea Cogliati, Holly B Hindman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina CanavesiLighTopTech Corp., West Henrietta, New York, United States.
Andrea CogliatiLighTopTech Corp., West Henrietta, New York, United States.
Holly B HindmanThe Eye Care Center, Canandaigua, New York, United States.
LighTopTech (United States) · USEye Care Associates · US

Funding

High-definition, wide field of view corneal imagingR44EY028827 · NEI · LIGHTOPTECH CORPORATION · PI CANAVESI, CRISTINA · 2020 to 2021
$1.7M
High-definition, wide field of view corneal imagingR43EY028827 · NEI · LIGHTOPTECH CORPORATION · PI CANAVESI, CRISTINA · 2018 to 2018
$275k
NEI NIH HHS R43 EY028827NEI NIH HHS R44 EY028827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceAn accurate, automated, and unbiased cell counting procedure is needed for tissue selection for corneal transplantation.

aimTo improve accuracy and reduce bias in endothelial cell density (ECD) quantification by combining Gabor-domain optical coherence microscopy (GDOCM) for three-dimensional, wide field-of-view (1  mm2) corneal imaging and machine learning for automatic delineation of endothelial cell boundaries. APPROACH: Human corneas stored in viewing chambers were imaged over a wide field-of-view with GDOCM without contacting the specimens. Numerical methods were applied to compensate for the natural curvature of the cornea and produce an image of the flattened endothelium. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to automatically delineate the cell boundaries using 180 manually annotated images from six corneas. Ten additional corneas were imaged with GDOCM and compared with specular microscopy (SM) to determine performance of the combined GDOCM and CNN to achieve automated endothelial counts relative to current procedural standards.

resultsCells could be imaged over a larger area with GDOCM than SM, and more cells could be delineated via automatic cell segmentation than via manual methods. ECD obtained from automatic cell segmentation of GDOCM images yielded a correlation of 0.94 (p  <  0.001) with the manual segmentation on the same images, and correlation of 0.91 (p  <  0.001) with the corresponding manually counted SM results.

conclusionsAutomated endothelial cell counting on GDOCM images with large field of view eliminates selection bias and reduces sampling error, which both affect the gold standard of manual counting on SM images.

Indexed as

Endothelium, CornealMicroscopyCorneaEndothelial CellsHumansMachine Learningcorneal imagingeye bankingmachine learningmicroscopyophthalmologyoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID32770867
PMCPMC7413309
OpenAlexW3048196425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.