Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770859›Full record

Trial reportAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2020

Randomised clinical study: oral aspirin 325 mg daily vs placebo alters gut microbial composition and bacterial taxa associated with colorectal cancer risk.

Anna E Prizment, Christopher Staley, Guillaume C Onyeaghala, Sithara Vivek, Bharat Thyagarajan, Robert J Straka, Ryan T Demmer, Dan Knights, Katie A Meyer, Aasma Shaukat and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna E PrizmentMinneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5924-6871
Christopher StaleyMinneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2309-0083
Guillaume C OnyeaghalaMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Sithara VivekMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Bharat ThyagarajanMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Robert J StrakaMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Ryan T DemmerMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Dan KnightsMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Katie A MeyerChapel Hill, NC, USA.
Aasma ShaukatMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Michael J SadowskyMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Timothy R ChurchMinneapolis, MN, USA.
Minneapolis Institute of Arts · USCommunities In Schools of Orange County · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
A Novel Gut Microbial-Dependent Nutrient Metabolite and AtherosclerosisK01HL127159 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MEYER, KATIE A · 2015 to 2019
$787k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL127159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAspirin is associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), potentially by modulating the gut microbiome.

aimsTo evaluate the effect of aspirin on the gut microbiome in a double-blinded, randomised placebo-controlled pilot trial.

methodsHealthy volunteers aged 50-75 received a standard dose of aspirin (325 mg, N = 30) or placebo (N = 20) once daily for 6 weeks and provided stool samples every 3 weeks for 12 weeks. Serial measurements of gut microbial community composition and bacterial abundance were derived from 16S rRNA sequences. Linear discriminant analysis of effect size (LEfSe) was tested for between-arm differences in bacterial abundance. Mixed-effect regression with binomial distribution estimated the effect of aspirin use on changes in the relative abundance of individual bacterial taxa via an interaction term (treatment × time).

resultsOver the study period, there were differences in microbial composition in the aspirin vs placebo arm. After treatment, four taxa were differentially abundant across arms: Prevotella, Veillonella, Clostridium XlVa and Clostridium XVIII clusters. Of pre-specified bacteria associated with CRC (n = 8) or aspirin intake (n = 4) in published studies, interactions were significant for four taxa, suggesting relative increases in Akkermansia, Prevotella and Ruminococcaceae and relative decreases in Parabacteroides, Bacteroides and Dorea in the aspirin vs placebo arm.

conclusionCompared to placebo, aspirin intake influenced several microbial taxa (Ruminococcaceae, Clostridium XlVa, Parabacteroides and Dorea) in a direction consistent with a priori hypothesis based on their association with CRC. This suggests that aspirin may influence CRC development through an effect on the gut microbiome. The findings need replication in a larger trial.

Indexed as

AgedAspirinBacteriaColorectal NeoplasmsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAspirinRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32770859
PMCPMC7719064
OpenAlexW3048229314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.