Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770387›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2021

The clinical and educational outcomes of an inter-professional student-led medication review team, a pilot study.

Michael O Reumerman, Milan C Richir, Philippe M Domela Nieuwenhuis, Rowan Sultan, Hester E M Daelmans, Hans Springer, Majon Muller, Michiel A van Agtmael, Jelle Tichelaar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael O ReumermanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.reumerman@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9060-0701
Milan C RichirDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Philippe M Domela NieuwenhuisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rowan SultanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hester E M DaelmansVUmc School of Medical Sciences, Institute of Education and Training, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Hans SpringerHogeschool Inholland, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Majon MullerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Michiel A van AgtmaelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jelle TichelaarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLInholland University of Applied Sciences · NLRijksmuseum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe involvement of an inter-professional healthcare student team in the review of medications used by geriatric patients could not only provide patients with optimized therapy but also provide students with a valuable inter-professional learning experience. We describe and evaluate the clinical and learning outcomes of an inter-professional student-run mediation review program (ISP). SUBJECT AND

methodA variable team consisting of students in medicine, pharmacy, master advanced nursing practice, and master physician assistant reviewed the medication lists of patients attending a specialized geriatric outpatient clinic.

resultsDuring 32 outpatient visits, 188 medications were reviewed. The students identified 14 medication-related problems, of which 4 were not recognized by healthcare professionals. The ISP team advised 95 medication changes, of which 68 (71.6%) were directly implemented. Students evaluated this pilot program positively and considered it educational (median score 4 out of 5) and thought it would contribute to their future inter-professional relationships.

conclusionAn inter-professional team of healthcare students is an innovative healthcare improvement for (academic) hospitals to increase medication safety. Most formulated advices were directly incorporated in daily practice and could prevent future medication-related harm. The ISP also offers students a first opportunity to work in an inter-professional manner and get insight into the perspectives and qualities of their future colleagues.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsMedication Therapy ManagementPatient Care TeamStudents, Health OccupationsAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMedication ReconciliationPilot ProjectsClinical pharmacologyElderly careInternal medicineInter-professionalMedical educationMedication reviewPharmacotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32770387
PMCPMC7782385
OpenAlexW3047935963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.