ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2020
Regional heterogeneity of afterload sensitivity in myocardial strain.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe peak systolic strain decreases due to afterload augmentation. However, its deterioration (i.e., afterload sensitivity) may be different within the left ventricular (LV) segments. We investigated how afterload influences regional strain and whether there is regional heterogeneity of afterload sensitivity.
methodsAfterload was increased by aortic banding in 20 open-chest dogs. Short-axis images were acquired at baseline and during banding. Circumferential strain was analyzed in six segments, and the absolute decrease in the peak systolic strain during banding (Δε) was calculated for each segment. To assess the effect of the compensatory preload recruitment during banding, the endocardial lengths of the septum and free wall were measured at end-diastole, and the rate of increase due to banding was calculated.
resultsLV systolic pressure was significantly increased during banding (100 ± 14 vs. 143 ± 18 mmHg, P < 0.001). The peak systolic strain in all segments was significantly decreased during banding. Δɛ in the anterior segment, which is a part of the free wall, was significantly lower than that in the inferoseptal segment (2.6 ± 4.7 vs. 6.5 ± 3.5%, P = 0.035). The rate of increase in endocardial length in the free wall was significantly larger than that in the septum (15.6 ± 10.4 vs. 8.1 ± 7.4%, P = 0.014).
conclusionThe decrease in septal strain during afterload augmentation was larger than that in free wall strain, indicating that there was regional heterogeneity of afterload sensitivity in circumferential strain. The larger compensatory preload recruitment in the free wall than in the septum is implicated as a cause of the heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.