Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770357›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2020

The Role of Statins in Current Guidelines.

Fabiana Rached, Raul D Santos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabiana RachedHeart Institute-InCor, University of Sao Paulo Medical School Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Raul D SantosHeart Institute-InCor, University of Sao Paulo Medical School Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil. rauldsf@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9860-6582
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe causal association of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) has been demonstrated in robust experimental, epidemiological, genetic, and interventional randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The goal of this review is to show how the knowledge acquired from statin RCTs influenced and was recommended on guidelines for prevention of ASCVD during the last three decades. RECENT

findingsGuideline recommendations have evolved with accruing information derived mostly from statin RCTs, and as decades passed, more intensive LDL-C lowering was recommended according to a given ASCVD risk. Recent guidelines are unanimous in recommending intensive LDL-C lowering for the highest-risk individuals; however, they differ regarding risk stratification tools, use of specific LDL-C targets, management of primary prevention individuals, and thresholds to start non-statin lipid-lowering therapies. Even considering the advent of non-statin therapies like ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors, due to their efficacy, safety, and low cost, guidelines state that statins persist as the main component of ASCVD preventive strategies and should be prescribed in adequate doses to attain evidence-based LDL-C lowering.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAtherosclerosisCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPCSK9 InhibitorsPrimary PreventionProprotein Convertase 9Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsSerine Proteinase InhibitorsCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPCSK9 InhibitorsPCSK9 protein, humanProprotein Convertase 9Serine Proteinase InhibitorsAtherosclerosisCardiovascular diseaseCholesterolGuidelinesStatins

Identifiers

PMID32770357
OpenAlexW3047950220

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.