ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Ecological risk assessment of arsenic, cadmium, copper, and lead contamination in soil in e-waste separating household area, Buriram province, Thailand.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustainable AFM-Based Nanolithography on Chitosan Thin Films for 2.5D and 3D Nanostructure Fabrication.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Thinking globally, acting locally in the 21iScience · 2024Review
- Article
- Heavy metals in the sediments of urban sinkholes in Cancun, Quintana Roo.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Airborne volatile organic compounds at an e-waste site in Ghana: Source apportionment, exposure and health risks.Journal of hazardous materials · 2021Article
- Highly sensitive colorimetric sensing of copper(ii) ions based on "CLICK-17" DNAzyme-catalyzed azide modified gold nanoparticles and alkyne capped dsDNA cycloaddition.RSC advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the arsenic (As), copper (Cu), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb) concentrations in the soil at e-waste separating houses in Buriram province. Soil samples were collected from five e-waste separating and five non-separating houses in each of two neighboring communities and from six reference houses located approximately 4 km away from the e-waste community. At each selected house, the surface (0-15-cm depth) and the subsurface (15-30-cm depths) soils were taken to be digested by a microwave digester and then analyzed for the heavy metal contents by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The As, Pb, and Cd levels in the e-waste separating sites ranged from < 0.012 to 1.380, 0.110 to 15.283, and < 0.014 to 0.284 mg/kg, respectively, which were not in excess of the Thai standard level for residential soil (As = 3.9, Pb = 400, and Cd = 37 mg/kg), while Cu ranged from 1.180 to 380.413 mg/kg and exceeded the intervention value (190 mg/kg) of contaminated soil at three sites from a total of ten sampling sites. The physical e-waste dismantling activity enhanced the As, Cd, and Cu contamination levels in the surface soils. Ecological risk assessment revealed that the risk posed by the heavy metals in soils was higher at the e-waste separating houses than those at the non-separating sites and was mainly attributed to the levels of Cu > As > Cd > Pb for the surface soils and Cd > Cu > As > Pb for the subsurface soil. The association of the heavy metal soil levels with e-waste activity showed that if the e-waste activities were continuously operated, the As and Cu levels in the surface soil were more likely to exceed those levels in the reference houses. A good procedure for e-waste dismantling is necessary to be developed and implemented to prevent soil contamination and other related environmental problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.