Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770321›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2020

Towards the Automatic Localization of the Irritative Zone Through Magnetic Source Imaging.

Gianvittorio Luria, Dunja Duran, Elisa Visani, Davide Rossi Sebastiano, Alberto Sorrentino, Laura Tassi, Alice Granvillano, Silvana Franceschetti, Ferruccio Panzica

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Magnetoencephalography for Epilepsy Presurgical Evaluation.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gianvittorio LuriaDepartment of Neurophysiology and Diagnostic Epileptology, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy. luria@dima.unige.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3462-5258
Dunja DuranDepartment of Neurophysiology and Diagnostic Epileptology, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Elisa VisaniDepartment of Neurophysiology and Diagnostic Epileptology, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Davide Rossi SebastianoDepartment of Neurophysiology and Diagnostic Epileptology, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alberto SorrentinoDepartment of Mathematics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Laura TassiEpilepsy Surgery Center, Ospedale Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Alice GranvillanoDepartment of Neurophysiology and Diagnostic Epileptology, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Silvana FranceschettiDepartment of Neurophysiology and Diagnostic Epileptology, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Ferruccio PanzicaDepartment of Neurophysiology and Diagnostic Epileptology, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITSuperconducting and other Innovative Materials and Devices Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present work aims at validating a Bayesian multi-dipole modeling algorithm (SESAME) in the clinical scenario consisting of localizing the generators of single interictal epileptiform discharges from resting state magnetoencephalographic recordings. We use the results of Equivalent Current Dipole fitting, performed by an expert user, as a benchmark, and compare the results of SESAME with those of two widely used source localization methods, RAP-MUSIC and wMNE. In addition, we investigate the relation between post-surgical outcome and concordance of the surgical plan with the cerebral lobes singled out by the methods. Unlike dipole fitting, the tested algorithms do not rely on any subjective channel selection and thus contribute towards making source localization more unbiased and automatic. We show that the two dipolar methods, SESAME and RAP-MUSIC, generally agree with dipole fitting in terms of identified cerebral lobes and that the results of the former are closer to the fitted equivalent current dipoles than those of the latter. In addition, for all the tested methods and particularly for SESAME, concordance with surgical plan is a good predictor of seizure freedom while discordance is not a good predictor of poor post-surgical outcome. The results suggest that the dipolar methods, especially SESAME, represent a reliable and more objective alternative to manual dipole fitting for clinical applications in the field of epilepsy surgery.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEpilepsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingBayes TheoremBrain MappingHumansMagnetoencephalographyBayesian methodsDipole modelingEpilepsyMagnetic source imagingMagnetoencephalography

Identifiers

PMID32770321
PMCPMC7429532
OpenAlexW3047749942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.