Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770311›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2020

When to transfuse your acute care patient? A narrative review of the risk of anemia and red blood cell transfusion based on clinical trial outcomes.

Gregory M T Hare, Melina P Cazorla-Bak, S F Michelle Ku, Kyle Chin, Nikhil Mistry, Michael C Sklar, Katerina Pavenski, Ahmad Alli, Adriaan Van Rensburg, Jan O Friedrich and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Iatrogenic anaemia and transfusion thresholds in ICU patients with COVID-19 disease at a tertiary care hospital.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory M T HareDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. greg.hare@unityhealth.to.
Melina P Cazorla-BakDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
S F Michelle KuDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Kyle ChinDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Nikhil MistryDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Michael C SklarDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Katerina PavenskiDepartments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ahmad AlliDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Adriaan Van RensburgDepartment of Anesthesia, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jan O FriedrichKeenan Research Centre for Biomedical Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrew J BakerDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
C David MazerDepartment of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
University of Toronto · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR 165808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review critically evaluates the evidence for risk of anemia and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. For this purpose, it assesses large prospective randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) in medical, surgical, and critical care patient populations in which the impact of specific hemoglobin transfusion thresholds are compared. In these trials, the risks of anemia relative to those of RBC transfusion are assessed. The results of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses are also discussed. Lastly, recommendations for patient blood management and treatment of anemia are explored. The main conclusion of this review emphasizes that the decision to transfuse RBCs is complex and depends on the interaction between multiple factors including the balance between the risk of anemia and the risk of RBC transfusion, existing patient comorbidities, and medical and surgical exposures. The transfusion thresholds recommended by current guidelines vary for medical and surgical patient populations. Guidelines suggesting specific transfusion thresholds for different patient populations should be viewed as a starting point for making an informed decision about RBC transfusion. Alternatives to transfusion (i.e., patient blood management), biomarkers of anemia-induced tissue hypoxia, and transfusion alternatives should continue to be evaluated in large RCTs, with the goal of improving event-free survival in critically ill and perioperative patients.

Indexed as

AnemiaErythrocyte TransfusionBlood TransfusionCritical CareCritical IllnessHemoglobinsHumansHemoglobinsanemiapatient blood managementPerioperative riskrandomized trialstransfusion

Identifiers

PMID32770311
OpenAlexW3048251634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.