ArticleJournal of animal science2020
Technical Note: Assessment of two methods for estimating bone ash in pigs.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of 25-Hydroxyvitamin DNutrients · 2026Article
- Synergistic Effects of 25-Hydroxyvitamin DAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Determination of available and total tract digestible phosphorus release curves for Microtech phytase.Translational animal science · 2026Article
- Bone Growth and Development in Different Breeds of Piglets at the Early Age Is Associated with Mineral Deposition.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin DAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025Article
- Diagnostic survey of analytical methods used to determine bone mineralization in pigs.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Effect of bone and analytical method on assessment of bone mineralization in response to dietary phosphorus, phytase, and vitamin D in finishing pigs.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Effects of added 25(OH)D3 with varying standardized total tract digestible phosphorus concentrations on nursery pig performance, bone characteristics, and serum vitamin D status.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Influence of added 1,25(OH)Translational animal science · 2024Article
- The effect of bone and analytical methods on the assessment of bone mineralization response to dietary phosphorus, phytase, and vitamin D in nursery pigs.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a novel phytase derived from Citrobacter braakii and expressed in Aspergillis oryzae on growth performance and bone mineralization indicators in nursery pigs.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- The effects of concurrent increases in supplementation of calcium and phytase on growth performance, balance of Ca and P, and bone mineralization in nursery pigs.Translational animal science · 2023Article
- Determining the phosphorus release curve for Smizyme TS G5 2,500 phytase from 500 to 2,500 FTU/kg in nursery pig diets.Translational animal science · 2023Article
- The effects of increasing dietary total Ca/total P ratios on growth performance, Ca and P balance, and bone mineralization in nursery pigs fed diets supplemented with phytase.Translational animal science · 2023Article
- Use of fixed calcium to phosphorus ratios in experimental diets may create bias in phytase efficacy responses in swine.Translational animal science · 2022Article
- Phosphorus nutrition of growing pigs.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2022Review
- Determining the phosphorus release of GraINzyme phytase in diets for nursery pigs.Translational animal science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data from three experiments conducted to evaluate the effects of increasing available P in swine diets were used to compare two different bone processing methods. Our objective was to determine if the procedures influenced treatment differences and the ability to detect changes in the percentage bone ash. In each experiment, pigs (nursery pigs in experiments 1 and 2, and finishing pigs in experiment 3) were fed a wide range of available phosphorus levels provided from either increasing monocalcium P or added phytase. At the completion of each experiment, a subset of pigs was euthanized, and either fibulas (experiments 1 and 2) or metacarpals (experiment 3) were collected to determine the percentage bone ash. Bones were processed by cleaning away all soft tissues followed by ether extraction for 7 d (defatted), or no lipid extraction (non-defatted), and then ashed. In nursery and finishing pigs, defatted bones had increased (P < 0.001) percentage bone ash compared with non-defatted bones. No evidence of a method × treatment interaction or linear and quadratic interactions were observed in bone ash weight and percentage bone ash (P > 0.10) for nursery pigs; however, a linear interaction was detected (P < 0.05) in percentage bone ash for grow-finish pigs. This response was minimal and likely due to increased variation observed in grow-finish pigs when bones were not defatted. The processing method did not affect the ability to detect differences among treatments as a result of changing dietary P concentrations in the nursery or grow-finish pigs. In summary, either non-defatted or defatted bone processing methods can be used to determine bone ash weight and percentage bone ash as a way to assess bone mineralization and dietary treatment differences in nursery pigs; however, the increased variation observed in mature pigs suggests that defatted bone processing is the preferred method for grow-finish pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.