Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770217›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2020

Glycemic response in nonracing sled dogs fed single starch ingredients and commercial extruded dog foods with different carbohydrate sources.

Alexandra Rankovic, Jennifer L Adolphe, D Dan Ramdath, Anna K Shoveller, Adronie Verbrugghe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The role of carbohydrates in canine and feline nutrition.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024
    Article
  5. Efficacy of vitamin DThe British journal of nutrition · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Roles of plant-based ingredients and phytonutrients in canine nutrition and health.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra RankovicDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Jennifer L AdolphePetcurean Pet Nutrition, Chilliwack, BC, Canada.
D Dan RamdathGuelph Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Anna K ShovellerDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Adronie VerbruggheDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
University of Guelph · CAAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study adapted the established glycemic index (GI) methodology used in human research to perform two studies in sled dogs in order to assess the blood glucose-raising potential of pulse-based dog foods. The first was a pilot study (n = 6 dogs) to determine the GI of single starch sources (white bread, cooked white rice, and cooked green lentils) using a glucose solution as control. Next, the effect on glycemic and insulinemic meal responses and GI of commercial extruded dog foods containing different categories of starch sources (traditional grain, whole grain, grain-free, and vegan) were investigated on 11 dogs using a glucose control. Results were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Consumption of 10 g of available carbohydrate (Av CHO) was insufficient to elicit a measurable response in blood glucose for GI determination, and as such, the amount was increased to 25 g for the second study. The GI (±SE) of the single starch sources and dog foods was: white bread: 47 ± 11, cooked white rice: 71 ± 14, cooked green lentils: 60 ± 20 (P = 0.569), traditional grain: 83 ± 17, whole grain: 56 ± 8, grain-free: 41 ± 6, and vegan: 65 ± 15 (P = 0.154). No statistical differences in glycemic response over time were observed between the single starch sources or the extruded diets tested (P = 0.1412; P = 0.2651). The insulinemic response elicited by the extruded diets was also not different (P = 0.079); however, the traditional grain diet did have the slowest time to peak for insulin (P = 0.0078). Among single starch sources and extruded dog foods, there were no differences in the glycemic indices measured in this study. The GI methodology has not been validated for use in canine species, and it is likely that our results were due to higher interindividual variation or inadequate study power. Regardless, this study will serve to better define future studies to investigate the potential physiological benefits of low GI foods for dogs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood GlucoseDietDietary CarbohydratesDogsEdible GrainFemaleGlycemic IndexHumansInsulinLens PlantMaleOryzaPilot ProjectsStarchTriticumBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesInsulinStarchcanineglycemic indexgrain-freeinsulinnutritionpulses

Identifiers

PMID32770217
PMCPMC7455921
OpenAlexW3048271030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.