Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770186›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2020

How to Teach Medical Students About Pain and Dementia: E-Learning, Experiential Learning, or Both?

Keelin Moehl, Rollin M Wright, Joseph Shega, Monica Malec, G Kelley Fitzgerald, Gregg Robbins-Welty, Kimberly Zoberi, Raymond Tait, Subashan Perera, Denise Deverts and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 'Medical education online · 2022
    Article
  7. The training of wrist arthroscopy.Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Keelin MoehlUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Rollin M WrightDepartment of Medicine (Geriatric Medicine), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Joseph ShegaVITAS Healthcare and University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
Monica MalecDepartment of Medicine (Geriatric and Palliative Medicine), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
G Kelley FitzgeraldDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Gregg Robbins-WeltyDuke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
Kimberly ZoberiSaint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Raymond TaitSaint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Subashan PereraVITAS Healthcare and University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
Denise DevertsOffice of Research, University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Zsuzsa HorvathDepartment of Dental Public Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Debra K WeinerDepartment of Medicine (Geriatric Medicine), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · USSaint Louis University · USUniversity of Central Florida · USDuke University Hospital · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201500082C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePain management in persons with mild to moderate dementia poses unique challenges because of altered pain modulation and the tendency of some individuals to perseverate. We aimed to test the impact of an e-learning module about pain in communicative people with dementia on third-year medical students who had or had not completed an experiential geriatrics course.

designAnalysis of pre- to postlearning changes and comparison of the same across the student group.

settingUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Saint Louis University School of Medicine. SUBJECTS: One hundred four University of Pittsburgh and 57 Saint Louis University medical students.

methodsUniversity of Pittsburgh students were randomized to view either the pain and dementia module or a control module on pain during a five-day geriatrics course. Saint Louis University students were asked to complete either of the two modules without the context of a geriatrics course. A 10-item multiple choice knowledge test and three-item attitudes and confidence questionnaires were administered before viewing the module and up to seven days later.

resultsKnowledge increase was significantly greater among students who viewed the dementia module while participating in the geriatrics course than among students who viewed the module without engaging in the course (P < 0.001). The modules did not improve attitudes in any group, while student confidence improved in all groups.

conclusionsMedical students exposed to e-learning or experiential learning demonstrated improved confidence in evaluating and managing pain in patients with dementia. Those exposed to both educational methods also significantly improved their knowledge.

Indexed as

DementiaEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalAdultCurriculumFemaleHumansMalePainProblem-Based LearningDementiaEducationMedical StudentPain

Identifiers

PMID32770186
PMCPMC7820358
OpenAlexW3047812891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.