Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770152›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

An enriched sugarcane diversity panel for utilization in genetic improvement of sugarcane.

Nathanael D Fickett, Leila Ebrahimi, Arnold P Parco, Andres V Gutierrez, Anna L Hale, Michael J Pontif, James Todd, Collins A Kimbeng, Jeffrey W Hoy, Tomas Ayala-Silva and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nathanael D Fickett *School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Leila Ebrahimi *School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Arnold P Parco *School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Andres V Gutierrez *School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Anna L HaleSugarcane Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Houma, LA, USA.
Michael J PontifSugar Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, St. Gabriel, LA, USA.
James ToddSugarcane Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Houma, LA, USA.
Collins A KimbengSugar Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, St. Gabriel, LA, USA.
Jeffrey W HoySugar Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, St. Gabriel, LA, USA.
Tomas Ayala-SilvaTropical Agricultural Research Station, Mayaguez, PR, USA.
Kenneth A GravoisSugar Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, St. Gabriel, LA, USA.
Niranjan BaisakhSchool of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA. nbaisakh@agcenter.lsu.edu.
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center · USAgricultural Research Service · USUniversity of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez · PR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugarcane crop is important for both sugar and biofuels. A world collection of sugarcane and related grasses (WCSRG) maintained at Miami, FL contains > 1,200 non-redundant clones of different species and genera within the Saccharum complex. However, linkage of undesirable alleles with useful genes in wild species has hindered its efficient utilization in sugarcane breeding. A core collection developed previously with smaller number of clones representing WCSRG did not take into account > 120 wild/exotic clones maintained at the USDA-ARS Sugarcane Research Unit in Houma, Louisiana. Moreover, the genome complexity and sub-tropical to temperate growing climate of Louisiana warrant a region-specific core collection that can be used for base-broadening breeding aimed at efficient introgression of desirable alleles. Genetic diversity of 1,485 clones within WCSRG and Louisiana (commercials, wild/exotic) using 423 SSR alleles showed an average gene diversity (h) at 0.208 among all species groups where Erianthus-like Saccharum species (ELSS), Miscanthus spp., and S. spontaneum each formed a distinct cluster, Saccharum robustum, S. officinarum, hybrid cultivars, and S. edule grouped together in a major cluster, and Saccharum sinense and S. barberi formed distinct grouping. A 309-clone diversity panel (SDP1) was developed that captured the genetic diversity based on the combination of maximum length subtree and manual selection to maximize representation of Louisiana clones and minimize import of clones from Miami. SDP1 shared 324 alleles out of the 423 alleles in the entire population of 1,485 clones and captured the genetic diversity of the entire collection with an average gene diversity (h) at 0.163. The variation within (11-17%) and among (83-89%) the populations in SDP1 were comparable with the entire population of 1,485 clones (9-15% and 85-91%, respectively). The breadth of the genetic variation of SDP1 was exemplified by the intra- and inter-specific diversity of a 190-clone mini-core collection with markers derived from known cold-responsive genes. SDP1 will facilitate genome-wide association studies for identification of trait-specific markers for use in marker-assisted breeding in Louisiana and elsewhere.

Indexed as

AllelesCrops, AgriculturalGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyLouisianaPlant BreedingSaccharumSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32770152
PMCPMC7414218
OpenAlexW3048335198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.