Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770114›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A tailored polylactic acid/polycaprolactone biodegradable and bioactive 3D porous scaffold containing gelatin nanofibers and Taurine for bone regeneration.

Hadi Samadian, Saeed Farzamfar, Ahmad Vaez, Arian Ehterami, Arindam Bit, Mostafa Alam, Arash Goodarzi, Gholamhossein Darya, Majid Salehi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Standardised Matrices for Stem Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Hadi SamadianNano Drug Delivery Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Saeed FarzamfarDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medical Sciences and Technologies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad VaezDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Arian EhteramiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Arindam BitNational Institute of Technology, Raipur, India.
Mostafa AlamDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arash GoodarziDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Gholamhossein DaryaDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Science, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Majid SalehiDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran. msalehi.te1392@gmail.com.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRFasa University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch · IRKermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRNational Institute of Technology Raipur · INShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRShahroud University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The focus of the current study was to develop a functional and bioactive scaffold through the combination of 3D polylactic acid (PLA)/polycaprolactone (PCL) with gelatin nanofibers (GNFs) and Taurine (Tau) for bone defect regeneration. GNFs were fabricated via electrospinning dispersed in PLA/PCL polymer solution, Tau with different concentrations was added, and the polymer solution converted into a 3D and porous scaffold via the thermally-induced phase separation technique. The characterization results showed that the scaffolds have interconnected pores with the porosity of up to 90%. Moreover, Tau increased the wettability and weight loss rate, while compromised the compressive strengths. The scaffolds were hemo- and cytocompatible and supported cell viability and proliferation. The in vivo studies showed that the defects treated with scaffolds filled with new bone. The computed tomography (CT) imaging and histopathological observation revealed that the PLA/PCL/Gel/Tau 10% provided the highest new bone formation, angiogenesis, and woven bone among the treatment groups. Our finding illustrated that the fabricated scaffold was able to regenerate bone within the defect and can be considered as the effective scaffold for bone tissue engineering application.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsBone RegenerationGelatinNanofibersPolyestersTaurineTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsMaleMaterials TestingRatsRats, WistarTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiocompatible MaterialsGelatinpolycaprolactonePolyesterspoly(lactide)Taurine

Identifiers

PMID32770114
PMCPMC7414882
OpenAlexW3047704401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.