Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32770111›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2020

Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores.

Cameron Radford, John Weldon McNutt, Tracey Rogers, Ben Maslen, Neil Jordan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The evolution of eyespots in skates and rays.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gold-standard experiments to deter predators from attacking farm animals.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Looking forward in 2021.Communications biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cameron RadfordCentre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
John Weldon McNuttBotswana Predator Conservation, Private Bag 13,, Maun, Botswana.
Tracey RogersEcology and Evolution Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Ben MaslenMark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Neil JordanCentre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. neil.jordan@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0712-8301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eyespots evolved independently in many taxa as anti-predator signals. There remains debate regarding whether eyespots function as diversion targets, predator mimics, conspicuous startling signals, deceptive detection, or a combination. Although eye patterns and gaze modify human behaviour, anti-predator eyespots do not occur naturally in contemporary mammals. Here we show that eyespots painted on cattle rumps were associated with reduced attacks by ambush carnivores (lions and leopards). Cattle painted with eyespots were significantly more likely to survive than were cross-marked and unmarked cattle, despite all treatment groups being similarly exposed to predation risk. While higher survival of eyespot-painted cattle supports the detection hypothesis, increased survival of cross-marked cattle suggests an effect of novel and conspicuous marks more generally. To our knowledge, this is the first time eyespots have been shown to deter large mammalian predators. Applying artificial marks to high-value livestock may therefore represent a cost-effective tool to reduce livestock predation.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsCattleFelidaeLionsPaintingsPigmentationPredatory Behavior

Identifiers

PMID32770111
PMCPMC7414152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.