From Bedside to Bytes and Back: Data Quality and Standardization for Research, Quality Improvement, and Clinical Decision Support in the Era of Electronic Health Records.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Toward Child-Centred Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: A Perspective on Clinical Decision Support, Stakeholder Engagement and Education.Pediatric reports · 2026
   Article
2. Digital solutions in paediatric sepsis: current state, challenges, and opportunities to improve care around the world.The Lancet. Digital health · 2024
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Validation of an Electronic Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 Score in a Mixed Quaternary PICU.2020

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as