SynthesisMedicine2020
The efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in psoriasis vulgaris: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rewiring the psoriasis-metabolism axis: therapeutic potential of saroglitazar beyond PPAR modulation.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Mechanistic insights into psoriasis and type 2 diabetes mellitus comorbidity - Implications for treatment: A review.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Review
- Repurposing FDA approved drugs for psoriasis indications through integrated molecular docking, one-SVM algorithm, and molecular dynamics simulation approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor γ and psoriasis, molecular and cellular biochemistry.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2022Review
- Clinical effects of antidiabetic drugs on psoriasis: The perspective of evidence-based medicine.World journal of diabetes · 2021Article
- A Molecular Perspective on the Potential Benefits of Metformin for the Treatment of Inflammatory Skin Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pioglitazone may have potential benefits in the treatment of cutaneous and metabolic derangements of psoriasis, but its role in the treatment of psoriasis remains in debate. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in psoriasis vulgaris (PsV).We performed a comprehensive search in database of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Embase and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wan fang database through March 2019 to identify eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials that have evaluated the effect and safety of pioglitazone in PsV were included. Treatment success was defined as ≥75% reduction in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score after treatment. Weighted mean differences (WMD), relative risks (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to compare the clinical efficacy and safety between different groups.Six randomized controlled trials (n = 270) were included. Meta-analysis showed that pioglitazone was associated with a remarkable reduction in PASI score in patients with PsV (weight mean difference: 2.68, 95% CI 1.41-3.94, P < .001). The treatment success rate in the pioglitazone group was higher than in the control group (RR 3.60, 95 CI 1.61-8.01, P < .001). Compared with control group, pioglitazone was not related to a pronounced increase in total adverse events (RR 1.180, 95 CI 0.85-1.63, P = .33). Moreover, the risk of common adverse events in the 2 groups were similar, such as elevated liver enzyme, fatigue, nausea, weight gain.This meta-analysis suggested pioglitazone is an effective and safe drug in the treatment of patients with PsV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.