Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32769754›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cataract and refractive surgery2020

Remote corneal suturing wet lab: microsurgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Neel D Pasricha, Zeeshan Haq, Tessnim R Ahmad, Lawrence Chan, Travis K Redd, Gerami D Seitzman, Neeti Parikh, Tyson N Kim, Julie M Schallhorn, Saras Ramanathan

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Online examination course instead of classroom teaching: adaptation of medical student teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neel D PasrichaFrom the Department of Ophthalmology (Pasricha, Haq, Chan, Redd, Seitzman, Parikh, Kim, Schallhorn, Ramanathan), School of Medicine (Ahmad), and Francis I. Proctor Foundation (Redd, Seitzman, Schallhorn), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Zeeshan Haq
Tessnim R Ahmad
Lawrence Chan
Travis K Redd
Gerami D Seitzman
Neeti Parikh
Tyson N Kim
Julie M Schallhorn
Saras Ramanathan
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSF-Proctor Clinician Vision Scholars K12 ProgramK12EY031372 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI THOMAS M LIETMAN, Yvonne Ou · 2020 to 2026
$3.9M
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY031372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study the feasibility and efficacy of a new remote wet lab for microsurgical education using a corneal suturing task.

settingDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

designProspective randomized controlled study.

methodsTen ophthalmology residents were stratified by postgraduate year and randomized to perform a corneal suturing task consisting of placing the 4 cardinal sutures for a penetrating keratoplasty in porcine eyes with or without remote ophthalmology attending feedback. Subsequently, both groups repeated the same task without remote feedback to test whether initial remote feedback affected subsequent performance. Finally, the group without feedback was crossed over to repeat the same corneal suturing task with remote feedback. The effectiveness of the remote wet lab was assessed subjectively by survey and objectively by grading each suture pass.

resultsResident-reported comfort with corneal suturing improved significantly after the remote wet lab for all residents. Residents and attendings rated the remote wet lab as equally or more effective compared with previous in-person wet labs and overall effective in corneal suturing. Attendings rated the remote wet lab as effective in multiple domains of microsurgical education using a modified microsurgical global rating scale. Objective corneal suturing performance was similar for both groups.

conclusionsThe remote wet lab was feasible and effective for training ophthalmology residents in corneal suturing. This represents a new social distancing compliant platform for microsurgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceInternship and ResidencySARS-CoV-2AdultAnimalsClinical CompetenceCorneaCOVID-19Educational MeasurementFemaleHumansKeratoplasty, PenetratingMaleMicrosurgeryOphthalmologyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32769754
PMCPMC7446976
OpenAlexW3047848120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.