Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32769183›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2020

A Multicenter Proposal for a Fast Tool To Screen Biosecure Chicken Flocks for the Foodborne Pathogen

Jeffrey Hoorfar, Ivana Koláčková, Gro S Johannessen, Giuliano Garofolo, Francesca Marotta, Kinga Wieczorek, Jacek Osek, Mona Torp, Bjørn Spilsberg, Camilla Sekse and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Accurate identification and discrimination ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Jeffrey HoorfarNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark jhoo@food.dtu.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-8523-0427
Ivana KoláčkováVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Gro S JohannessenNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Giuliano GarofoloNational Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale, Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7017-3888
Francesca MarottaNational Reference Laboratory for Campylobacter, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale, Teramo, Italy.
Kinga WieczorekNational Veterinary Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland.
Jacek OsekNational Veterinary Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland.
Mona TorpNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn SpilsbergNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Camilla SekseNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Natasia Rebekka ThornvalNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Renáta KarpíškováVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Norwegian Veterinary Institute · NOIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale · ITNational Veterinary Research Institute · PLTechnical University of Denmark · DKVeterinary Research Institute · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present multicenter study aimed at assessing the performance of air sampling as a novel method for monitoring

Indexed as

ChickensAnimalsCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsCzech RepublicDenmarkItalyNorwayPolandPoultry Diseasesair samplingcampylobacteriosispathogen testingPCRrapid diagnosisrisk assessmentzoonoses

Identifiers

PMID32769183
PMCPMC7531958
OpenAlexW3047370366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.