Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32769075›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Remote Assessment of Functional Mobility and Strength in Older Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Study.

Cindy K Blair, Elizabeth Harding, Carla Herman, Tawny Boyce, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Sally Davis, Anita Y Kinney, Vernon S Pankratz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04339959 (Remote Assessment of Physical Function in Older Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04339959 completednot on this map

Remote Assessment of Physical Function in Older Cancer Survivors

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of New MexicoRan2019 to 2021Enrolled33ConditionsCancer SurvivorsArmsRemote Assessment of Physical Function with Direct Observation, Remote Assessment of Physical Function
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cindy K BlairDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6698-678X
Elizabeth HardingDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2964-7468
Carla HermanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-3494
Tawny BoyceComprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-5539
Wendy Demark-WahnefriedDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-932X
Sally DavisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-7801
Anita Y KinneyDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2996-9355
Vernon S PankratzDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3742-040X
University of New Mexico · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARBARA A GOWER · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
Improving Physical Functioning in Older Cancer Survivors Through Light-Intensity Physical ActivityK07CA215937 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BLAIR, CINDY KAY · 2018 to 2022
$772k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA215937NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder cancer survivors, faced with both age- and treatment-related morbidity, are at increased and premature risk for physical function limitations. Physical performance is an important predictor of disability, quality of life, and premature mortality, and thus is considered an important target of interventions designed to prevent, delay, or attenuate the physical functional decline. Currently, low-cost, valid, and reliable methods to remotely assess physical performance tests that are self-administered by older adults in the home-setting do not exist, thus limiting the reach, scalability, and dissemination of interventions.

objectiveThis paper will describe the rationale and design for a study to evaluate the accuracy, reliability, safety, and acceptability of videoconferencing and self-administered tests of functional mobility and strength by older cancer survivors in their own homes.

methodsTo enable remote assessment, participants receive a toolkit and instructions for setting up their test course and communicating with the investigator. Two standard gerontologic performance tests are being evaluated: the Timed Up and Go test and the 30-second chair stand test. Phase 1 of the study evaluates proof-of-concept that older cancer survivors (age ≥60 years) can follow the testing protocol and use a tablet PC to communicate with the study investigator. Phase 2 evaluates the criterion validity of videoconference compared to direct observation of the two physical performance tests. Phase 3 evaluates reliability by enrolling 5-10 participants who agree to repeat the remote assessment (without direct observation). Phase 4 enrolls 5-10 new study participants to complete the remote assessment test protocol. Feedback from participants in each phase is used to refine the test protocol and instructions.

resultsEnrollment began in December 2019. Ten participants completed the Phase 1 proof-of-concept. The study was paused in mid-March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study is expected to be completed by the end of 2020.

conclusionsThis validity and reliability study will provide important information on the acceptability and safety of using videoconferencing to remotely assess two tests of functional mobility and strength, self-administered by older adults in their homes. Videoconferencing has the potential to expand the reach, scalability, and dissemination of interventions to older cancer survivors, and potentially other older adults, especially in rural areas.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04339959; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04339959. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/20834.

Indexed as

cancercancer survivorselderlyolder adultsphysical activityphysical functionphysical performanceremote assessmenttelehealthvideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID32769075
PMCPMC7492978
OpenAlexW3048066686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.