Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32769021›Full record

ArticleAutonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical2020

The ectopy-triggering ganglionated plexuses in atrial fibrillation.

Min-Young Kim, Belinda Sandler, Markus B Sikkel, Christopher D Cantwell, Kevin M Leong, Vishal Luther, Louisa Malcolme-Lawes, Michael Koa-Wing, Fu Siong Ng, Norman Qureshi and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ganglionated plexi ablation impact on atrial fibrillation mechanisms and outcomes in patients with low scar burden.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Feasibility of mapping and ablating ectopy-triggering ganglionated plexus reproducibly in persistent atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Immunohistochemical characteristics of local sites that trigger atrial arrhythmias in response to high-frequency stimulation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Size matters in atrial fibrillation: the underestimated importance of reduction of contiguous electrical mass underlying the effectiveness of catheter ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Min-Young KimMyocardial Function Section, NHLI, Imperial College London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Belinda SandlerMyocardial Function Section, NHLI, Imperial College London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Markus B SikkelMyocardial Function Section, NHLI, Imperial College London, UK; Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Christopher D CantwellMyocardial Function Section, NHLI, Imperial College London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Kevin M LeongDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Vishal LutherDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Louisa Malcolme-LawesDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michael Koa-WingDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Fu Siong NgMyocardial Function Section, NHLI, Imperial College London, UK; Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Norman QureshiDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Afzal SohaibDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK; Barts Health NHS Trust, UK.
Zachary I WhinnettDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michael FudgeDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Elaine LimDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michelle ToddDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ian WrightDepartment of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas S PetersMyocardial Function Section, NHLI, Imperial College London, UK; Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Phang Boon LimMyocardial Function Section, NHLI, Imperial College London, UK; Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas W F LintonMyocardial Function Section, NHLI, Imperial College London, UK; Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Prapa KanagaratnamMyocardial Function Section, NHLI, Imperial College London, UK; Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: p.kanagaratnam@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/13/73/30352British Heart Foundation FS/15/25/31423British Heart Foundation RG/16/3/32175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpicardial ganglionated plexuses (GP) have an important role in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). The relationship between anatomical, histological and functional effects of GP is not well known. We previously described atrioventricular (AV) dissociating GP (AVD-GP) locations. In this study, we hypothesised that ectopy triggering GP (ET-GP) are upstream triggers of atrial ectopy/AF and have different anatomical distribution to AVD-GP.

objectivesWe mapped and characterised ET-GP to understand their neural mechanism in AF and anatomical distribution in the left atrium (LA).

methods26 patients with paroxysmal AF were recruited. All were paced in the LA with an ablation catheter. High frequency stimulation (HFS) was synchronised to each paced stimulus for delivery within the local atrial refractory period. HFS responses were tagged onto CARTO™ 3D LA geometry. All geometries were transformed onto one reference LA shell. A probability distribution atlas of ET-GP was created. This identified high/low ET-GP probability regions.

results2302 sites were tested with HFS, identifying 579 (25%) ET-GP. 464 ET-GP were characterised, where 74 (16%) triggered ≥30s AF/AT. Median 97 (IQR 55) sites were tested, identifying 19 (20%) ET-GP per patient. >30% of ET-GP were in the roof, mid-anterior wall, around all PV ostia except in the right inferior PV (RIPV) in the posterior wall.

conclusionET-GP can be identified by endocardial stimulation and their anatomical distribution, in contrast to AVD-GP, would be more likely to be affected by wide antral circumferential ablation. This may contribute to AF ablation outcomes.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationPulmonary VeinsAgedAtrial FibrillationAtrial Premature ComplexesFemaleGanglia, AutonomicHeartHumansMaleMiddle AgedPericardiumAtrial fibrillationAutonomic nervous systemGanglionated plexusIntrinsic cardiac nervesPulmonary vein ectopy

Identifiers

PMID32769021
PMCPMC7511599
OpenAlexW3044171940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.