Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32768565›Full record

ArticleInfection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases2020

COVID-19: Time to exonerate the pangolin from the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to humans.

Roger Frutos, Jordi Serra-Cobo, Tianmu Chen, Christian A Devaux

Open access · greenAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cats and SARS-CoV-2: A Scoping Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  15. There is no "origin" to SARS-CoV-2.Environmental research · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 to humans.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Roger FrutosCirad, UMR 17, Intertryp, Montpellier, France; IES, UMR 5214 Univ. Montpellier-CNRS, Montpellier, France. Electronic address: roger.frutos@cirad.fr.
Jordi Serra-CoboDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Barcelona, Biodiversity Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Tianmu ChenState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, PR China.
Christian A DevauxIHU-Méditerranée Infection and CNRS, Marseille, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ESXiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of COVID-19 has triggered many works aiming at identifying the animal intermediate potentially involved in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to humans. The presence of SARS-CoV-2-related viruses in Malayan pangolins, in silico analysis of the ACE2 receptor polymorphism and sequence similarities between the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the spike proteins of pangolin and human Sarbecoviruses led to the proposal of pangolin as intermediary. However, the binding affinity of the pangolin ACE2 receptor for SARS-CoV-2 RBD was later on reported to be low. Here, we provide evidence that the pangolin is not the intermediate animal at the origin of the human pandemic. Moreover, data available do not fit with the spillover model currently proposed for zoonotic emergence which is thus unlikely to account for this outbreak. We propose a different model to explain how SARS-CoV-2 related coronaviruses could have circulated in different species, including humans, before the emergence of COVID-19.

Indexed as

PandemicsAmino Acid SequenceAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsBetacoronavirusChiropteraCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19EutheriaGene ExpressionHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansPeptidyl-Dipeptidase APhylogenyPneumonia, ViralProtein BindingACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Peptidyl-Dipeptidase ASpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2CoronavirusCOVID-19PangolinSARS-CoV-2ZoonosisZoonotic model

Identifiers

PMID32768565
PMCPMC7405773
OpenAlexW3047456039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.