Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32768446›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical informatics2020

Clinical concept extraction: A methodology review.

Sunyang Fu, David Chen, Huan He, Sijia Liu, Sungrim Moon, Kevin J Peterson, Feichen Shen, Liwei Wang, Yanshan Wang, Andrew Wen and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Use of unstructured text in prognostic clinical prediction models: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Assessing genetic counseling efficiency with natural language processing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sunyang FuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States; University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: Fu.Sunyang@mayo.edu.
David ChenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: Chen.David@mayo.edu.
Huan HeDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: He.Huan@mayo.edu.
Sijia LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: Liu.Sijia@mayo.edu.
Sungrim MoonDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: Moon.Sungrim@mayo.edu.
Kevin J PetersonDepartment of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States; University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: Peterson.Kevin@mayo.edu.
Feichen ShenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: Shen.Feichen@mayo.edu.
Liwei WangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: Wang.Liwei@mayo.edu.
Yanshan WangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: Wang.Yanshan@mayo.edu.
Andrew WenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: Wen.Andrew@mayo.edu.
Yiqing ZhaoDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: Zhao.Yiqing@mayo.edu.
Sunghwan SohnDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: Sohn.Sunghwan@mayo.edu.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States; University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. Electronic address: Liu.Hongfang@mayo.edu.

Funding

Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Semi-structured Information Retrieval in Clinical Text for Cohort IdentificationR01LM011934 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HERSH, WILLIAM R, LIU, HONGFANG · 2014 to 2025
$5.1M
Secondary use of EMRs for surgical complication surveillanceR01EB019403 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, STORLIE, CURTIS · 2015 to 2022
$3.8M
Secondary use of EMR for residency training in asthma care and documentationR21AI142702 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JUHN, YOUNG J, SOHN, SUNGHWAN · 2019 to 2020
$437k
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI142702NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019403NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcept extraction, a subdomain of natural language processing (NLP) with a focus on extracting concepts of interest, has been adopted to computationally extract clinical information from text for a wide range of applications ranging from clinical decision support to care quality improvement.

objectivesIn this literature review, we provide a methodology review of clinical concept extraction, aiming to catalog development processes, available methods and tools, and specific considerations when developing clinical concept extraction applications.

methodsBased on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search was conducted for retrieving EHR-based information extraction articles written in English and published from January 2009 through June 2019 from Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the ACM Digital Library.

resultsA total of 6,686 publications were retrieved. After title and abstract screening, 228 publications were selected. The methods used for developing clinical concept extraction applications were discussed in this review.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalNatural Language ProcessingBibliometricsResearch DesignConcept extractionDeep learningElectronic health recordsInformation extractionMachine learningNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID32768446
PMCPMC7746475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.