Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32768443›Full record

ReviewMechanisms of ageing and development2020

Untangling the complexity of multimorbidity with machine learning.

Abdelaali Hassaine, Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi, Dexter Canoy, Kazem Rahimi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mechanisms of ageing and development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdelaali HassaineDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gholamreza Salimi-KhorshidiDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dexter CanoyDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kazem RahimiDeep Medicine, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kazem.rahimi@wrh.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/18/65/33872Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of multimorbidity has been increasing in recent years, posing a major burden for health care delivery and service. Understanding its determinants and impact is proving to be a challenge yet it offers new opportunities for research to go beyond the study of diseases in isolation. In this paper, we review how the field of machine learning provides many tools for addressing research challenges in multimorbidity. We highlight recent advances in promising methods such as matrix factorisation, deep learning, and topological data analysis and how these can take multimorbidity research beyond cross-sectional, expert-driven or confirmatory approaches to gain a better understanding of evolving patterns of multimorbidity. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of machine learning to identify likely causal links between previously poorly understood disease associations while giving an estimate of the uncertainty on such associations. We finally summarise some of the challenges for wider clinical adoption of machine learning research tools and propose some solutions.

Indexed as

Health Information ManagementMachine LearningMultimorbidityHumansMediation AnalysisPrevalenceDeep learningElectronic health recordsMachine learningMultimorbidityPhenotyping

Identifiers

PMID32768443
PMCPMC7493712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.