ArticleJournal of pediatric urology2020
A simulated model for fluid and tissue heating during pediatric laser lithotripsy.
Article in Journal of pediatric urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Model-based simulations of pulsed laser ablation using an embedded finite element method.International journal of heat and mass transfer · 2023Article
- Watt determines the temperature during laser lithotripsy.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Pediatric Stone Surgery: What Is Hot and What Is Not.Current urology reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLaser lithotripsy (LL) is a common modality for treatment of children and adolescents with nephrolithiasis. Recent introduction of higher-powered lasers may result in more efficacious "dusting" of urinary calculi. However, in vivo animal studies and computational simulations have demonstrated rapid and sustained rise of fluid temperatures with LL, possibly resulting in irreversible tissue damage. How fluid and tissue heating during LL vary with pediatric urinary tract development, however, is unknown. We hypothesize that kidneys of younger children will be more susceptible to changes in fluid temperature and therefore tissue damage than those of older children.
methodsComputational simulations were developed for LL in children utilizing COMSOL Multiphysics finite-element modeling software. Simulation parameters were varied, including the child's age (3, 8, and 12 years), flow of irrigation fluid (gravity - 5 mL/min or continuous pressure flow - 40 mL/min), treatment location (renal pelvis, ureter, calyx), and power settings (5 W - 40 W). Using a simplified axisymmetric geometry to represent the collecting space, the model accounted for heat transfer via diffusion, convection, perfusion, and heat sourcing as well as tissue properties and blood flow of the urothelium and renal parenchyma. Laminar and heat-induced convection flow were simulated, assuming room-temperature ureteroscopic irrigation. Renal size was varied by age, based on normative values. The maximum fluid temperature after 60 s of simulated LL was captured. Thermal dose was calculated using the t
resultsSimulation with gravity flow irrigation revealed generation of thermal doses sufficient to cause tissue injury for all ages at 20 W and 40 W power settings. Higher temperatures were seen in younger ages across all power settings. Temperature increases were dampened with intermittent laser activity and continuous pressure flow irrigation.
conclusionsSmaller renal size is more susceptible to thermal changes induced by LL. However, power settings equal to or greater than 20 W can result in temperatures high enough for tissue damage at any age. Continuous pressure flow and intermittent laser activity may mitigate the potential thermal damage from high power LL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.