Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32768050›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2020

Spatially localized sparse representations for breast lesion characterization.

Keni Zheng, Chelsea Harris, Predrag Bakic, Sokratis Makrogiannis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keni ZhengDivision of Physics, Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delaware State University, 1200 N. DuPont Hwy, Dover, DE, 19901-2277, USA.
Chelsea HarrisDivision of Physics, Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delaware State University, 1200 N. DuPont Hwy, Dover, DE, 19901-2277, USA.
Predrag BakicDepartment of Radiology, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19152, USA.
Sokratis MakrogiannisDivision of Physics, Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delaware State University, 1200 N. DuPont Hwy, Dover, DE, 19901-2277, USA. Electronic address: smakrogiannis@desu.edu.
DuPont (United States) · USDelaware State University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

QUANTITATIVE IMAGE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR STUDIES OF AGING PHENOTYPES AND AGE-RELATED DISEASESSC3GM113754 · NIGMS · DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MAKROGIANNIS, SOKRATIS · 2015 to 2024
$686k
NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM113754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe topic of sparse representation of samples in high dimensional spaces has attracted growing interest during the past decade. In this work, we develop sparse representation-based methods for classification of radiological imaging patterns of breast lesions into benign and malignant states.

methodsWe propose a spatial block decomposition method to address irregularities of the approximation problem and to build an ensemble of classifiers (CL) that we expect to yield more accurate numerical solutions than conventional whole-region of interest (ROI) sparse analyses. We introduce two classification decision strategies based on maximum a posteriori probability (BBMAP-S), or a log likelihood function (BBLL-S).

resultsTo evaluate the performance of the proposed approach we used cross-validation techniques on imaging datasets with disease class labels. We utilized the proposed approach for separation of breast lesions into benign and malignant categories in mammograms. The level of difficulty is high in this application and the accuracy may depend on the lesion size. Our results indicate that the proposed integrative sparse analysis addresses the ill-posedness of the approximation problem, producing AUC (area under the receiver operating curve) value of 89.1% for randomized 30-fold cross-validation.

conclusionsFurthermore, our comparative experiments showed that the BBLL-S decision function may yield more accurate classification than BBMAP-S because BBLL-S accounts for possible estimation bias.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyBreastFemaleHumansBreast lesion characterizationCAD/CADxSparse analysis

Identifiers

PMID32768050
PMCPMC7416513
OpenAlexW3043140028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.