ArticleCritical care (London, England)2020
ECCO
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of draining cannula position and configuration under high-flow extracorporeal COJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2026Article
- Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal integrated into continuous renal replacement therapy in pediatric patients with ARDS: a retrospective single-center case series.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Strategy of Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Combined With Central Airway Stricture: A Case Report.Respirology case reports · 2026Article
- Practice and Perceptions on Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in the Current Era: A Multinational Survey.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCOThe journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2026Article
- The Evolving Role of Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in Acute Respiratory Failure: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Physiologic Rationale and Phenotype-Based Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Prediction of Long-Term Mortality in Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure with Use of Low-Flow Veno-Venous Extracorporeal COBlood purification · 2026Article
- Extracorporeal COAnnals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Effect of low bicarbonate substitution solution on COIntensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Combined Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal (ECCO2R) With Renal Replacement Therapy and Blood Purification in a Severe Inhalation Injury Patient-Case Report.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025Article
- Advancing extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal technology: bridging basic science and clinical practice.Medical gas research · 2025Review
- The role of extracorporeal COFrontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Application of nafamostat mesylate in 5 cases of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal combined with continuous renal replacement therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Expert perspectives on ECCOAnnals of intensive care · 2024Article
- Reply to TiruvoipatiAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Extracorporeal organ support for critically ill patients: Overcoming the past, achieving the maximum at present, and redefining the future.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Contribution of electrical impedance tomography to personalize positive end-expiratory pressure under ECCOCritical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal to De-escalate Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2024Article
- Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 15 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith recent advances in technology, patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ae-COPD) could benefit from extracorporeal CO
methodsA modified Delphi-based method was used to collate European experts' views to better understand how ECCO
resultsFourteen participants were selected based on known clinical expertise in critical care and in providing respiratory support with ECCO
conclusionsInsights from this group of experienced physicians suggest that ECCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.