Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32767832›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2021

A new multidrug-resistant enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli pulsed-field gel electrophoresis cluster associated with enrofloxacin non-susceptibility in diseased pigs.

M de Lagarde, G Vanier, G Desmarais, H-R Kohan-Ghadr, J Arsenault, J M Fairbrother

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M de LagardeOIE Reference Laboratory for Escherichia coli, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8179-7514
G VanierOIE Reference Laboratory for Escherichia coli, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
G DesmaraisOIE Reference Laboratory for Escherichia coli, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
H-R Kohan-GhadrDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
J ArsenaultSwine and Poultry Infectious Research Center (CRIPA-FQRNT), and Groupe de recherche en épidémiologie des zoonoses et santé publique (GREZOSP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
J M FairbrotherOIE Reference Laboratory for Escherichia coli, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7163-1756

Funding

• Consortium de recherche et innovations en bioprocédés industriels au Québec (CRIBIQ) grant No. 2016-047-C22Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies CRIP Regroupements stratégiques 111946• Groupe de Recherche en Zoonoses et Santé Publique (GREZOSP) of the Université de Montréal.Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation Programme Innov'Action grant No. 116645Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2018-06560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo describe the temporal trends in Escherichia coli pathotypes and antimicrobial resistance detected in isolates from diseased-pig cases submitted to the EcL from 2008 to 2016, in Quebec, Canada, and to investigate the presence of spatiotemporal and phylogenetic clusters. METHODS AND

resultsDetection of 12 genes coding for virulence factors in pathogenic E. coli in pigs by PCR and antimicrobial resistance standard disc diffusion assay were performed. Demographic and clinical data were entered in the Animal Pathogenic and Zoonotic E. coli (APZEC) database. ETEC:F4 was the most prevalent pathovirotype among the 3773 cases submitted. The LT:STb:F4 virotype was predominant until 2014, then was overtaken by the LT:STb:STa:F4 virotype. More than 90% of the ETEC:F4 isolates were multidrug resistant. A spatiotemporal cluster of LT:STb:STa:F4 isolates non-susceptible to enrofloxacin was detected between 4/2015 and 9/2016. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of 137 ETEC:F4 isolates revealed the presence of a cluster composed mainly of LT:STb:STa:F4 isolates non-susceptible to enrofloxacin.

conclusionsThe APZEC database was useful to highlight temporal trends in E. coli pathotypes. A high-risk ETEC:F4 clone might disseminate in the pig population in Quebec since 2015. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Surveillance is crucial to identify new clones and develop control strategies.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnimalsCanadaDatabases, FactualElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEnrofloxacinEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsPhylogenySwineSwine DiseasesVirulence FactorsEnrofloxacinVirulence Factorsantimicrobial resistanceclonal complexEscherichia coliETECfluoroquinolones non-susceptibilitypigs

Identifiers

PMID32767832
PMCPMC7984379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.