ArticleDiagnostic cytopathology2020
Multiplatform molecular test performance in indeterminate thyroid nodules.
Article in Diagnostic cytopathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2023 European Thyroid Association Clinical Practice Guidelines for thyroid nodule management.European thyroid journal · 2023Guideline
- Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of Co-Mutations and Genetic Variations on Malignancy Risk in RAS-Positive Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: an Institutional Experience.Endocrine pathology · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of pre-operative genetic testing for thyroid cancer on fine needle aspiration cytology specimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Molecular Diagnostics and Personalized Therapeutics in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Clinically Oriented Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Proteomics and Machine Learning Analysis to Distinguish Follicular Adenoma and Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma from Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Towards an Integrated Multi-Omic Approach to Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration in Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- False negative rate and concordance of ThyGeNEXT®+ThyraMIR® testing with post-thyroidectomy histopathology.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2025Article
- Paediatric Thyroid Carcinoma: The Genetic Revolution and Its Implications for Therapy and Outcomes.Cancers · 2025Review
- The Landmark Series: Testing in Thyroid Nodule Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- Thyroid Nodule Characterization: Overview and State of the Art of Diagnosis with Recent Developments, from Imaging to Molecular Diagnosis and Artificial Intelligence.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Current State of Molecular Cytology in Thyroid Nodules: Platforms and Their Diagnostic and Theranostic Utility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Diagnostic utility ofEXCLI journal · 2024Review
- Unnecessary thyroid surgery rate for suspicious nodule in the absence of molecular testing.European thyroid journal · 2023Article
- Outcomes of ATA Low-Risk Pediatric Thyroid Cancer Patients Not Treated With Radioactive Iodine Therapy.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023Article
- miRNAs: Targets to Investigate Herpesvirus Infection Associated with Neurological Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- ThyroidPrint®: clinical utility for indeterminate thyroid cytology.Endocrine-related cancer · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 25% of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) have cytology that is indeterminate for malignant disease. Accurate risk stratification of these FNAs with ancillary testing would reduce unnecessary thyroid surgery.
methodsWe evaluated the performance of an ancillary multiplatform test (MPTX) that has three diagnostic categories (negative, moderate, and positive). MPTX includes the combination of a mutation panel (ThyGeNEXT®) and a microRNA risk classifier (ThyraMIR®). A blinded, multicenter study was performed using consensus histopathology diagnosis among three pathologists to validate test performance.
resultsUnanimous consensus diagnosis was reached in 197 subjects with indeterminate thyroid nodules; 36% had disease. MPTX had 95% sensitivity (95% CI,86%-99%) and 90% specificity (95% CI,84%-95%) for disease in prevalence adjusted nodules with Bethesda III and IV cytology. Negative MPTX results ruledout disease with 97% negative predictive value (NPV; 95% CI,91%-99%) at a 30% disease prevalence, while positive MPTX results ruledin high risk disease with 75% positive predictive value (PPV; 95% CI,60%-86%). Such results are expected in four out of five Bethesda III and IV nodules tested, including RAS positive nodules in which the microRNA classifier was useful in rulingin disease. 90% of mutation panel false positives were due to analytically verified RAS mutations detected in benign adenomas. Moderate MPTX results had a moderate rate of disease (39%, 95% CI,23%-54%), primarily due to RAS mutations, wherein the possibility of disease could not be excluded.
conclusionsOur results emphasize that decisions for surgery should not solely be based on RAS or RAS-like mutations. MPTX informs management decisions while accounting for these challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.