Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32767663›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2020

Predictive features of gene expression variation reveal mechanistic link with differential expression.

Olga M Sigalova, Amirreza Shaeiri, Mattia Forneris, Eileen Em Furlong, Judith B Zaugg

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bacterial stress responses lower mRNA-protein level correlations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olga M SigalovaGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8598-1079
Amirreza ShaeiriStructures and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2715-7652
Mattia FornerisGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2126-9207
Eileen Em FurlongGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9544-8339
Judith B ZauggStructures and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8324-4040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For most biological processes, organisms must respond to extrinsic cues, while maintaining essential gene expression programmes. Although studied extensively in single cells, it is still unclear how variation is controlled in multicellular organisms. Here, we used a machine-learning approach to identify genomic features that are predictive of genes with high versus low variation in their expression across individuals, using bulk data to remove stochastic cell-to-cell variation. Using embryonic gene expression across 75 Drosophila isogenic lines, we identify features predictive of expression variation (controlling for expression level), many of which are promoter-related. Genes with low variation fall into two classes reflecting different mechanisms to maintain robust expression, while genes with high variation seem to lack both types of stabilizing mechanisms. Applying this framework to humans revealed similar predictive features, indicating that promoter architecture is an ancient mechanism to control expression variation. Remarkably, expression variation features could also partially predict differential expression after diverse perturbations in both Drosophila and humans. Differential gene expression signatures may therefore be partially explained by genetically encoded gene-specific features, unrelated to the studied treatment.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsCell CommunicationComputational BiologyDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansMachine LearningSpecies SpecificityDrosophila Proteinsembryogenesisexpression variationgene expressionpromoterstranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID32767663
PMCPMC7411568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.