Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32767571›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020

Interventions for escalation of therapy for acute exacerbations of asthma in children: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.

Simon S Craig, Stuart R Dalziel, Colin Ve Powell, Andis Graudins, Franz E Babl, Carole Lunny

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Eosinophilia and wheeze: thinking beyond asthma.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical standards for the diagnosis and management of asthma in low- and middle-income countries.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Simon S CraigDepartment of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Stuart R DalzielDepartments of Surgery and Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Colin Ve PowellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sidra Medciine, Doha, Qatar.
Andis GraudinsDepartment of Medicine, Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Franz E BablEmergency Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
Carole LunnyCochrane Hypertension Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Collaborative Research Group · AUCardiff University · GBMonash University · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma is an illness that commonly affects adults and children, and it serves as a common reason for children to attend emergency departments. An asthma exacerbation is characterised by acute or subacute worsening of shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, and chest tightness and may be triggered by viral respiratory infection, poor compliance with usual medication, a change in the weather, or exposure to allergens or irritants. Most children with asthma have mild or moderate exacerbations and respond well to first-line therapy (inhaled short-acting beta-agonists and systemic corticosteroids). However, the best treatment for the small proportion of seriously ill children who do not respond to first-line therapy is not well understood. Currently, a large number of treatment options are available and there is wide variation in management.

objectivesMain objective - To summarise Cochrane Reviews with or without meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of second-line treatment for children with acute exacerbations of asthma (i.e. after first-line treatments, titrated oxygen delivery, and administration of intermittent inhaled short-acting beta MAIN

resultsWe identified 17 potentially eligible Cochrane Reviews but extracted data from, and rated the quality of, 13 reviews that reported results for children alone. We excluded four reviews as one did not include any randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one did not provide subgroup data for children, and the last two had been updated and replaced by subsequent reviews. The 13 reviews included 67 trials; the number of trials in each review ranged from a single trial up to 27 trials. The vast majority of comparisons included between one and three trials, involving fewer than 100 participants. The total number of participants included in reviews ranged from 40 to 2630. All studies included children; 16 (24%) included children younger than two years of age. Most of the reviews reported search dates older than four years. We have summarised the published evidence as outlined in Cochrane Reviews. Key findings, in terms of our primary outcomes, are that (1) intravenous magnesium sulfate was the only intervention shown to reduce hospital length of stay (high-certainty evidence); (2) no evidence suggested that any intervention reduced the risk of intensive care admission (low- to very low-certainty evidence); (3) the risk of hospital admission was reduced by the addition of inhaled anticholinergic agents to inhaled beta AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis overview provides the most up-to-date evidence on interventions for escalation of therapy for acute exacerbations of asthma in children from Cochrane Reviews of randomised controlled trials. A vast majority of comparisons involved between one and three trials and fewer than 100 participants, making it difficult to assess the balance between benefits and potential harms. Due to the lack of comparative studies between various treatment options, we are unable to make firm practice recommendations. Intravenous magnesium sulfate appears to reduce both hospital length of stay and the risk of hospital admission. Hospital admission is also reduced with the addition of inhaled anticholinergic agents to inhaled beta

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionSystematic Reviews as TopicAcute DiseaseAdministration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAminophyllineAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAsthmaBiasBronchodilator AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCholinergic AntagonistsHeliumHumansAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAminophyllineAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchodilator AgentsCholinergic AntagonistshelioxHeliumLeukotriene AntagonistsMagnesium SulfateOxygen

Identifiers

PMID32767571
PMCPMC8078579
OpenAlexW2789344366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.