ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2020
The Role of Biomarkers to Evaluate Cardiotoxicity.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic changes in cardiac biomarkers in radiotherapy for oesophageal cancer and their correlations with cardiac radiation dosimetry.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Serum Biomarkers for Risk Stratification and Patient Management in Cardio-Oncology.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Qualification of translational safety biomarkers.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementModerate-level evidence suggests that cardiac troponin and natriuretic peptides are useful for risk stratification and early identification of anthracycline cardiotoxicity; however, many of these studies used older chemotherapy regimens, and thus, the applicability to current anthracycline treatment regimens is uncertain. Further research is needed to determine optimal timing and thresholds for troponin and natriuretic peptides in anthracycline-treated patients and evaluate these and other promising biomarkers for anti-HER2 therapies, thoracic radiation, anti-VEGF therapy, and fluoropyrimidine therapy-related cardiotoxicity. Risk tools that combine cardiac risk factors, cancer treatment variables, biomarkers, and imaging parameters are most likely to accurately identify individuals at highest risk for cancer therapy cardiotoxicity. Clinical trials focusing cardioprotective strategies on high-risk individuals are more likely to result in clinically significant results compared with primary prevention cardioprotective approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32767198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.