Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32767146›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Applying the Delphi process for development of a hepatopancreaticobiliary robotic surgery training curriculum.

Yuman Fong, Joseph F Buell, Justin Collins, John Martinie, Christiane Bruns, Allan Tsung, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Ido Nachmany, Bjørn Edwin, Johann Pratschke and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pre-Procedural Robotic Surgery Curricula: A Systematic Review and Thematic Meta-Synthesis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Review
  8. Designing self-assessment tools for learning five instrumental clinical procedures in ENT: A modified Delphi consensus approach.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. RoCS: Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Yuman FongDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91011, USA. yfong@coh.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8934-9959
Joseph F BuellDepartment of Surgery, Mission Healthcare, HCA Healthcare, North Carolina Division, MAHEC University of North Carolina, Asheville, NC, USA.
Justin CollinsDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
John MartinieDepartment of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Christiane BrunsDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Allan TsungDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Pierre-Alain ClavienDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ido NachmanyDepartment of "Surgery B". Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv & The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Bjørn EdwinThe Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway.
Johann PratschkeDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Evgeny SolomonovDepartment of General and Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Ziv Medical Centre, Zefat (Safed), Israel.
Alfred KoenigsrainerDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Pier Cristoforo GiulianottiDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Carolinas Medical Center · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECity Of Hope National Medical Center · USKarolinska Institutet · SEMission Health · USOslo University Hospital · NORebecca Sieff Hospital · ILTel Aviv University · ILThe Ohio State University · USUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) procedures are performed worldwide and establishing processes for safe adoption of this technology is essential for patient benefit. We report results of the Delphi process to define and optimize robotic training procedures for HPB surgeons.

methodsIn 2019, a robotic HPB surgery panel with an interest in surgical training from the Americas and Europe was created and met. An e-consensus-finding exercise using the Delphi process was applied and consensus was defined as 80% agreement on each question. Iterations of anonymous voting continued over three rounds.

resultsMembers agreed on several points: there was need for a standardized robotic training curriculum for HPB surgery that considers experience of surgeons and based on a robotic hepatectomy includes a common approach for "basic robotic skills" training (e-learning module, including hardware description, patient selection, port placement, docking, troubleshooting, fundamentals of robotic surgery, team training and efficiency, and emergencies) and an "advanced technical skills curriculum" (e-learning, including patient selection information, cognitive skills, and recommended operative equipment lists). A modular approach to index procedures should be used with video demonstrations, port placement for index procedure, troubleshooting, and emergency scenario management information. Inexperienced surgeons should undergo training in basic robotic skills and console proficiency, transitioning to full procedure training of e-learning (video demonstration, simulation training, case observation, and final evaluation). Experienced surgeons should undergo basic training when using a new system (e-learning, dry lab, and operating room (OR) team training, virtual reality modules, and wet lab; case observations were unnecessary for basic training) and should complete the advanced index procedural robotic curriculum with assessment by wet lab, case observation, and OR team training.

conclusionsOptimization and standardization of training and education of HPB surgeons in robotic procedures was agreed upon. Results are being incorporated into future curriculum for education in robotic surgery.

Indexed as

CurriculumDelphi TechniqueAccreditationBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresClinical CompetenceHumansLiverPancreasRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsConsensusE-learningHPB surgeryRoboticSurgical educationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID32767146
OpenAlexW3047924844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.