Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32767103›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

A decade of radiomics research: are images really data or just patterns in the noise?

Daniel Pinto Dos Santos, Matthias Dietzel, Bettina Baessler

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. MRI-based radiomic analysis of soft tissue reactions near total hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Pinto Dos SantosInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Germany. daniel.pinto-dos-santos@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4785-6394
Matthias DietzelInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Bettina BaesslerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key points• Although radiomics is potentially a promising approach to analyze medical image data, many pitfalls need to be considered to avoid a reproducibility crisis.• There is a translation gap in radiomics research, with many studies being published but so far little to no translation into clinical practice.• Going forward, more studies with higher levels of evidence are needed, ideally also focusing on prospective studies with relevant clinical impact.

Indexed as

Reproducibility of ResultsHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32767103
PMCPMC7755615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.