Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32767089›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2020

Over- and undersensing-pitfalls of arrhythmia detection with implantable devices and wearables.

Johannes Sperzel, Christian W Hamm, Andreas Hain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes SperzelHeartcenter, Electrophysiology/Device therapies, Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH, Benekestr. 2-8, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Germany. j.sperzel@kerckhoff-klinik.de.
Christian W HammHeartcenter, Electrophysiology/Device therapies, Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH, Benekestr. 2-8, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Andreas HainHeartcenter, Electrophysiology/Device therapies, Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH, Benekestr. 2-8, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are a cornerstone of arrhythmia and heart failure detection as well as management. In recent years new kinds of devices have emerged which can be used subcutaneously or worn on the skin. In particular for large-scale arrhythmia monitoring, small, unobtrusive gadgets seem positioned to upend paradigms and care delivery. However, the performance of CIEDs and wearables is only as good as their sensing and detection capacities. Whether for pacing, defibrillation or diagnostic monitoring, the device must be able to process and filter the sensed signal to reduce noise and to exclude irrelevant physiological signals. The demands on sensing and detection quality will differ depending on how the information is applied. With a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter/defibrillator, withheld or erroneous therapy can have severe consequences and accurate and reliable detection of cardiac function is crucial. Monitoring devices are usually used in risk assessment and management, with greater tolerance for isolated artefacts or lower quality of readings. This review discusses sensing and detection and the performance to date by CIEDs as well as subcutaneous and wearable devices.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacWearable Electronic DevicesDefibrillators, ImplantableHeart FailureHumansPacemaker, ArtificialArrhythmia detectionDefibrillatorOver- and undersensingPacemakerWearables

Identifiers

PMID32767089
PMCPMC7412442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.