Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32767050›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020

Prognostic Utility of Pre- and Postoperative Circulating Tumor DNA Liquid Biopsies in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases.

Joel M Baumgartner, Paul Riviere, Richard B Lanman, Kaitlyn J Kelly, Jula Veerapong, Andrew M Lowy, Razelle Kurzrock

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel M Baumgartner *Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. j1baumgartner@ucsd.edu.
Paul Riviere *Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Richard B LanmanGuardant Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA.
Kaitlyn J KellyDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jula VeerapongDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Andrew M LowyDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Razelle KurzrockCenter for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
University of California, San Diego · USGuardant (United States) · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteTL1TR001443 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DEPP, COLIN A. · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001443NCI NIH HHS CA023100NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NIH HHS TL1TR001443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising technology for treatment selection, prognostication, and surveillance after definitive therapy. Its use in the perioperative setting for patients with metastatic disease has not been well studied. We characterize perioperative plasma ctDNA and its association with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe recruited 71 patients undergoing surgery for peritoneal metastases and evaluated their plasma with a targeted 73-gene ctDNA next-generation sequencing test before and after surgery. The association between perioperative ctDNA, as well as other patient factors, and PFS was evaluated by Cox regression.

resultsctDNA was detectable in 28 patients (39.4%) preoperatively and in 37 patients (52.1%) postoperatively. Patients with high ctDNA [maximum somatic variant allele fraction (MSVAF) > 0.25%] had worse PFS than those with low MSVAF (< 0.25%) in both the pre- and postoperative settings (median 4.8 vs. 19.3 months, p < 0.001, and 9.2 vs.15.0 months, p = 0.049, respectively; log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, high-grade histology [hazard ratio (HR) 3.42, p = 0.001], incomplete resection (HR 2.35, p = 0.010), and high preoperative MSVAF (HR 3.04, p = 0.001) were associated with worse PFS. Patients with new postoperative alterations in the context of preoperative alteration(s) also had a significantly shorter PFS compared with other groups (HR 4.28, p < 0.001).

conclusionsHigh levels of perioperative ctDNA and new postoperative ctDNA alterations in the context of preoperative alterations predict worse outcomes in patients undergoing resection for peritoneal metastases. This may highlight a role for longitudinal ctDNA surveillance in this population.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNALiquid BiopsyPeritoneal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPostoperative PeriodPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNACancer prognosticationCancer surveillanceLiquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID32767050
PMCPMC7470602
OpenAlexW3047401551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.