Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32767042›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2021

Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of ependymomas in the upper cervical spinal cord: a single-center experience of 155 consecutive patients.

Xiaobin Fei, Wenqing Jia, Heng Gao, Chenlong Yang, Da Li, Zenghui Qian, Bo Han, Dejiang Wang, Yulun Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Preoperative risk stratification for long-term neurological status in spinal ependymoma: an MRI-centered nomogram.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaobin FeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Wenqing JiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Heng GaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Jiangyin People's Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Wuxi, 214400, Jiangsu, China.
Chenlong YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Da LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Zenghui QianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Bo HanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Dejiang WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.
Yulun XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China. xuhuxi@sina.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-1930
Capital Medical University · CNJiangyin People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ependymomas occurring in the upper cervical spinal cord (above the level of the C4 segment) are rare entities with great therapeutic challenges. This study was aimed to investigate the clinicoradiological characteristics and the prognosis in a large cohort of upper cervical ependymomas from a single institution. This retrospective study enrolled 155 patients with primary ependymomas in the upper cervical spinal cord. The pre- and post-operative clinical and magnetic resonance imaging profiles were collected. The neurological outcomes and survival events were evaluated, and potential independent risk factors were analyzed. There were 82 females and 73 males, with an average age of 43.1 ± 11.3 years. Immediately post-operatively, 118 (76.1%) patients experienced neurological deterioration and 32 (20.7%) patients remained unchanged. Three months after surgery, 61 (39.4%) patients showed deteriorated neurological functions compared to the pre-operative baseline levels. After an average follow-up period of 56.0 ± 24.7 months, the neurological functions were worse than the baseline status in 37 (23.9%) patients and improved in 33 (21.3%) patients, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified that lower age (≤ 42 years) and lower pre-operative MMS (I-II) were independent protective factors for predicting favorable neurological functions. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that incomplete resection was the only independent risk factor associated with a shorter progression-free survival. Age and pre-operative functional status affect the long-term neurological outcomes, and incomplete resection was associated with a shorter survival. Our findings indicate that gross total resection should be the goal of surgical treatment of upper cervical ependymomas.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCervical CordCohort StudiesEpendymomaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSpinal Cord NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultEpendymomaIntramedullary tumorPrognosisSurgical resectionUpper cervical spinal cord

Identifiers

PMID32767042
OpenAlexW3047993502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.