Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32766940›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2020

A Meta-Analysis of Neuropsychological Effort Test Performance in Psychotic Disorders.

Ivan Ruiz, Ian M Raugh, Lisa A Bartolomeo, Gregory P Strauss

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Is there evidence for additive neurocognitive deficits in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and co-occurring conditions?Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Assessing harmonized intelligence measures in a multinational study.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivan RuizDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Ian M RaughDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Lisa A BartolomeoDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Gregory P StraussDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. gstrauss@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · US

Funding

Computationally modeling the failure of effort to become a secondary reinforcer in schizophreniaR21MH122863 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI SHENHAV, AMITAI, STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2020 to 2020
$441k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH122863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychotic disorders are characterized by a generalized neurocognitive deficit (i.e., performance 1.5 SD below controls across neuropsychological domains with no specific profile of differential deficits). A motivational account of the generalized neurocognitive deficit has been proposed, which attributes poor neuropsychological testing performance to low effort. However, findings are inconsistent regarding effort test failure rate in individuals with psychotic disorders across studies (0-72%), and moderators are unclear, making it difficult to know whether the motivational explanation is viable. To address these issues, a meta-analysis was performed on data from 2205 individuals with psychotic disorders across 19 studies with 24 independent effects. Effort failure rate was examined along with moderators of effort test type, forensic status, IQ, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, diagnosis, age, gender, education, and antipsychotic use. The pooled weighted effort test failure rate was 18% across studies and there was a moderate pooled association between effort failure rate and global neurocognitive performance (r = .57). IQ and education significantly moderated failure rate. Collectively, these findings suggest that a nontrivial proportion of individuals with a psychotic disorder fail effort testing, and failure rate is associated with global neuropsychological impairment. However, given that effort tests are not immune to the effects of IQ in psychotic disorders, these results cannot attest to the viability of the motivational account of the generalized neurocognitive deficit. Furthermore, the significant moderating effect of IQ and education on effort test performance suggests that effort tests have questionable validity in this population and should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

AdultCognition DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMotivationNeuropsychological TestsPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyEffortGeneralized neurocognitive deficitIntellectual functioningPerformance validity testPsychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID32766940
PMCPMC7447112
OpenAlexW3048317744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.