Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32766880›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2020

Future-proof and sustainable healthy diets based on current eating patterns in the Netherlands.

Roline Broekema, Marcelo Tyszler, Pieter van 't Veer, Frans J Kok, Agnès Martin, Anne Lluch, Hans T J Blonk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Toward healthy and sustainable diets for the 21st century: Importance of sociocultural and economic considerations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Carbon dioxide (COEnvironmental health : a global access science source · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roline BroekemaBlonk Consultants, Gouda, Netherlands.
Marcelo TyszlerBlonk Consultants, Gouda, Netherlands.
Pieter van 't VeerDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Frans J KokDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Agnès MartinDepartment of Global Public Affairs, Danone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau, France.
Anne LluchDepartment of Global Public Affairs, Danone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau, France.
Hans T J BlonkBlonk Consultants, Gouda, Netherlands.
PNO Consultants (Netherlands) · NLDanone (France) · FRWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo keep global warming <1.5°C as recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), eating patterns must change. However, future diets should be modeled at a national level and respect cultural acceptability.

objectivesWe aimed to identify diets among Dutch adults satisfying nutritional and selected environmental requirements while deviating minimally from the baseline diet among Dutch adults.

methodsWe calculated per capita food system greenhouse gas emission (GHGE) targets derived from the IPCC 1.5-degree assessment study. Using individual adult dietary intake from the National Food Consumption Survey in the Netherlands (2007-2010) to form a baseline, we used quadratic optimization to generate diets that followed the baseline Dutch diet as closely as possible, while satisfying nutritional goals and remaining below GHGE targets. We considered 12 scenarios in which we varied GHGE targets [2050: 1.11 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (kg CO2-eq) per person per day (pppd); 2030: 2.04 kg CO2-eq pppd; less strict 2030: 2.5 kg CO2-eq pppd; no target], modeled eating patterns (food-based dietary guidelines; flexitarian; pescatarian; lacto-ovo-vegetarian; vegan), and conducted exploratory analyses (food diversity; acceptability; food chain interdependency).

resultsOptimized solutions for 2030 required major decreases (<33% of baseline values) in consumption of beef, pork, cheese, snacks, and butter and increased consumption (>150% of baseline values) of legumes, fish and shellfish, peanuts, tree nuts, vegetables, soy foods, and soy drink. Eight food groups were within 33%-150% of the baseline diet among Dutch adults. The optimized solution complying to the lowest GHGE target (2050) lacked food diversity, and the (lacto-ovo) vegetarian and vegan optimized diets were prone to nutritional inadequacies.

conclusionsWithin Dutch eating habits, satisfying optimization constraints required a shift away from beef, cheese, butter, and snacks toward plant-based foods and fish and shellfish, questioning acceptability. Satisfying 2050 food system GHGE targets will require research in consumer preferences and breakthrough innovations in food production and processing.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeFood SupplyAgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesDiet, HealthyEnergy IntakeHumansNetherlandsNutrition SurveysNutritive Valuedietary changedietary scenariosenvironmental impacthealth impactsustainability

Identifiers

PMID32766880
PMCPMC7657328
OpenAlexW3047920423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.