Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32766552›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2020

Stress Hyperglycemia and Mortality in Subjects With Diabetes and Sepsis.

Andrea Fabbri, Giulio Marchesini, Barbara Benazzi, Alice Morelli, Danilo Montesi, Cesare Bini, Stefano Giovanni Rizzo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea FabbriEmergency Department, Presidio Ospedaliero Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì (FC), Italy.
Giulio MarchesiniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Alma Mater" University, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Barbara BenazziEmergency Department, Presidio Ospedaliero Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì (FC), Italy.
Alice MorelliEmergency Department, Presidio Ospedaliero Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì (FC), Italy.
Danilo MontesiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, "Alma Mater" University, Bologna, Italy.
Cesare BiniHealthcare Management Unit, Presidio Ospedaliero Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì (FC), Italy.
Stefano Giovanni RizzoQatar Computing Research Institute (QCRI), HBKU, Doha, Qatar.
Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITQatar Cardiovascular Research Center · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPoor glycemic control is associated with mortality in critical patients with diabetes. The aim of the study was to assess the predicting value of stress hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes following hospital admission for sepsis.

designRetrospective observational study.

settingAdult, emergency department, and critical care in a district hospital. PATIENTS: In a 10-year retrospective analysis of sepsis-related hospitalizations in the emergency department, we carried out a secondary analysis of 915 patients with diabetes (males, 54.0%) in whom both fasting glucose at entry and glycosylated hemoglobin were available.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPatients' mean age was 79.0 (sd 11.0), glucose at admission was 174.0 mg/dL (74.3 mg/dL), and glycosylated hemoglobin was 7.7% (1.7%). Stress hyperglycemia was defined by the stress hyperglycemia ratio, that is, fasting glucose concentration at admission divided by the estimated average glucose derived from glycosylated hemoglobin. A total of 305 patients died (33.3%) in hospital. Factors associated with in-hospital case fatality rate were tested by multivariable logistic model. Ten variables predicting outcomes in the general population were confirmed in the presence of diabetes (male sex, older age, number of organ dysfunction diagnoses, in particular cardiovascular dysfunction, infection/parasitic, circulatory, respiratory, digestive diseases diagnosis, and Charlson Comorbidity Index). In addition, also glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin: odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.15-1.40) and stress hyperglycemia (stress hyperglycemia ratio: 5.25; 3.62-7.63) were significant case fatality rate predictors. High stress hyperglycemia ratio (≥ 1.14) significantly increased the discriminant capacity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.864; se, 0.013;

conclusionsStress hyperglycemia, even in the presence of diabetes, is predictive of mortality following admission for sepsis. Stress hyperglycemia ratio may be used to refine prediction of an unfavorable outcome.

Indexed as

diabetesemergency departmentmortalitysepsisstress hyperglycemia ratio

Identifiers

PMID32766552
PMCPMC7365708
OpenAlexW3043236083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.