ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Incorporating the Voice of Community Based Pediatricians to Improve Discharge Communication.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Discharge Timeliness and Documentation.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCommunication between pediatric hospitalists and primary care physicians (PCPs) at discharge is an essential part of a successful transition to home. While many hospitals require communicating with PCPs for all admitted patients, it is unknown if PCPs find such communication valuable or if it improves outcomes. Our global aim was to improve discharge communication for patients that pediatric hospitalists and PCPs deemed appropriate.
methodsWe sent surveys to 422 outpatient pediatricians in our care network to understand their communication preferences. Survey results informed local guidelines for when hospitalists should directly contact PCPs. We determined the proportion of inpatient discharges meeting those guidelines and set a target for our primary process metric: the proportion of discharges with attempted direct PCP contact. We engaged in Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, including a discharge documentation tool in the electronic health record, education of inpatient teams, email reminders including group performance data, asynchronous Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant messaging application, and competitions that shared blinded individual data.
resultsWe increased the percentage of documented direct communication with the PCPs from 2% to 33% and from 4% to 65% for those who met guidelines for direct communication.
conclusionsPCPs only want direct communication on a subset of discharges. Interventions focused on high-yield populations improved discharge communication in our institution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.