ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Implementation of a Modified Neonatal Early-onset Sepsis Calculator in Well-baby Nursery: a Quality Improvement Study.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Penicillin allergy testing in pregnancy improves maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Quality improvement: enhancing antibiotic stewardship for suspected early onset neonatal infection by refining use of the Kaiser Permanente screening tool and using a CRP threshold of 20 mg/L.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Implementation of an EOS calculator-based protocol decreased infant antibiotic exposure in chorioamnionitis without correlation with placental histopathology.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Observational
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of the Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator: A Multicenter Survey Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Paediatric sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE): a comprehensive review.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Review
- Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Pediatric, Neonatal, and Maternal Inpatients: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Reduction of unnecessary antibiotic days in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022Article
- Medication Use in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Changes from 2010 to 2018.The Journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of sepsis risk scores (SRSs), calculated based on the neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator, has been shown to limit the unwarranted sepsis evaluations and to reduce the empirical use of antibiotics in neonates.s. PURPOSE: To reduce both the sepsis evaluation rate (SER) and antibiotic initiation rate (AIR) by 25% from baseline by incorporating conservative SRS cutoff values into the routine sepsis risk assessment of well-appearing neonates born at 34 weeks and older gestation.
methodsDuring a pre quality improvement (QI) period (June 2016-August 2016), a QI team calculated SRS on all newborn infants to determine safe SRS cutoff values. During the QI-study period (September 2016-November 2017), we implemented an EOS evaluation algorithm based on 2 SRS cutoff values, 0.05 (later increased to 0.1) for sepsis evaluation and 0.3 for the initiation of antibiotic therapy. Monthly SER and AIR were summarized and analyzed by using standard statistical tests and statistical process control charts. During the surveillance phase (January 2019-June 2019), we evaluated whether previously attained improvements in SER and AIR were sustained.
resultsDuring the pre-QI period, the mean (±SD) of monthly SER and monthly AIR were 23.8% (±5.7%) and 6.2% (±0.4%), respectively. During the QI-study period, the mean (±SD) of monthly SER and monthly AIR decreased to 15% (±4.7%),
conclusionThe implementation of a modified EOS calculator-based EOS algorithm using a conservative approach was successful in reducing antibiotic exposure and the need for blood work in well-appearing neonates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.