Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32766455›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2020

PyOmeroUpload: A Python toolkit for uploading images and metadata to OMERO.

Johnny Hay, Eilidh Troup, Ivan Clark, Julian Pietsch, Tomasz Zieliński, Andrew Millar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multiphoton intravital microscopy of rodents.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johnny HayEPCC, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9685-3718
Eilidh TroupEPCC, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5666-8427
Ivan ClarkSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.
Julian PietschSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.
Tomasz ZielińskiSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0194-5706
Andrew MillarSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1756-3654

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tools and software that automate repetitive tasks, such as metadata extraction and deposition to data repositories, are essential for researchers to share Open Data, routinely. For research that generates microscopy image data, OMERO is an ideal platform for storage, annotation and publication according to open research principles. We present

Indexed as

Data sharingDockermetadatamicroscopyOMEROresearch data management

Identifiers

PMID32766455
PMCPMC7388197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.