ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2020
Automated identification of retinopathy of prematurity by image-based deep learning.
Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review of current algorithms.Eye (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Review
- Why aren't we using AI in eye clinics? A systematic review of barriers and solutions in AI-based fundus image diagnostics for ocular diseases.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Macretina: a dataset, to support deep learning assisted retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reimagining Pediatrics in a World of Artificial Intelligence: Will We Be Empowered or Imperiled?Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Review
- Feasibility of Multimodal Deep Learning for Automated Staging of Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy Using Color Fundus Photographs and Fluorescein Angiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Retinopathy of Prematurity From 2010 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence virtual assistants in primary eye care practice.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
- Deep learning applications for diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity diseases diagnosis: a systematic review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Automated detection of type 1 ROP, type 2 ROP and A-ROP based on deep learning.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- An Interpretable System for Screening the Severity Level of Retinopathy in Premature Infants Using Deep Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Retina Fundus Photograph-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Medicine: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Review
- Retinal Image Dataset of Infants and Retinopathy of Prematurity.Scientific data · 2024Article
- A Beginner's Guide to Artificial Intelligence for Ophthalmologists.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Review
- Assessing spectral effectiveness in color fundus photography for deep learning classification of retinopathy of prematurity.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Automated diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity using quantification of vessels characteristics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Automatic zoning for retinopathy of prematurity with a key area location system.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a semi-supervised deep learning model for automatic retinopathy of prematurity staging.iScience · 2024Article
- Analysis of research hotspots and trends in pediatric ophthalmopathy based on 10 years of WoSCC literature.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Teleophthalmology and retina: a review of current tools, pathways and services.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide but can be a treatable retinal disease with appropriate and timely diagnosis. This study was performed to develop a robust intelligent system based on deep learning to automatically classify the severity of ROP from fundus images and detect the stage of ROP and presence of plus disease to enable automated diagnosis and further treatment.
methodsA total of 36,231 fundus images were labeled by 13 licensed retinal experts. A 101-layer convolutional neural network (ResNet) and a faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster-RCNN) were trained for image classification and identification. We applied a 10-fold cross-validation method to train and optimize our algorithms. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were assessed in a four-degree classification task to evaluate the performance of the intelligent system. The performance of the system was compared with results obtained by two retinal experts. Moreover, the system was designed to detect the stage of ROP and presence of plus disease as well as to highlight lesion regions based on an object detection network using Faster-RCNN.
resultsThe system achieved an accuracy of 0.903 for the ROP severity classification. Specifically, the accuracies in discriminating normal, mild, semi-urgent, and urgent were 0.883, 0.900, 0.957, and 0.870, respectively; the corresponding accuracies of the two experts were 0.902 and 0.898. Furthermore, our model achieved an accuracy of 0.957 for detecting the stage of ROP and 0.896 for detecting plus disease; the accuracies in discriminating stage I to stage V were 0.876, 0.942, 0.968, 0.998 and 0.999, respectively.
conclusionsOur system was able to detect ROP and differentiate four-level classification fundus images with high accuracy and specificity. The performance of the system was comparable to or better than that of human experts, demonstrating that this system could be used to support clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.