ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
A Simple and Scarless Method for Inframammary Fold Correction Using a Barbed Suture.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The inframammary fold: Structure, clinical considerations, and reconstructive techniques.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Comparison of methods for inframammary fold fixation of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Inframammary Fold Reconstruction Techniques: A Scoping Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Hug Flap and Hamdi Hammock: Two Innovative Techniques for Enhancing Aesthetic Outcomes in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Defining the Inframammary Fold by Liposuction: An Essential Tool in Aesthetic Shaping of the Reconstructed Breast. Technique and Long-term Results in a Series of Patients.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the typical procedure for secondary correction of the inframammary fold (IMF) following breast reconstruction, a large incision is often required, and this increases surgical invasiveness. The "drawstring method" is a simple procedure for recreating a smooth IMF. We modified the drawstring method and developed an essentially scarless method for IMF correction from small stab incisions.
methodsPatients at our hospital who presented with IMF ptosis or loss of definition after breast reconstruction and required IMF correction, as well as those who requested IMF recreation for the contralateral breast, during the period spanning May 2016 to June 2019 were considered for this study. We collected and analyzed demographic data, as well as complications and postoperative outcomes.
resultsThe new method was performed on 20 patients, with the following breakdown: IMF recreation after breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (11 patients), IMF recreation after breast reconstruction with a breast implant (2 patients), IMF recreation after breast reconstruction with fat graft (5 patients), and IMF recreation for the contralateral breast (2 patients). Overcorrection of the IMF stabilized by 2-3 months postoperatively, resulting in a smooth and well-defined IMF. For non-breast implant cases, the implant volume increased at the lower pole. Slack in the suture was observed in only 2 patients of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator group and in 1 patient of the breast implant group after 6 months postoperatively.
conclusionsOur new method allows for the recreation of an essentially scarless, smooth, and well-defined IMF. IMF definition can be adjusted by altering the depth of the barbed suture. Since this method can be performed under local anesthesia, it offers the benefits of reducing medical costs and physical burden on patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.