Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32765975›Full record

ReviewApplications in plant sciences2020

Machine learning: A powerful tool for gene function prediction in plants.

Elizabeth H Mahood, Lars H Kruse, Gaurav D Moghe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applications in plant sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. BioprospectingFrontiers in fungal biology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth H MahoodPlant Biology Section School of Integrative Plant Sciences Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7087-6580
Lars H KrusePlant Biology Section School of Integrative Plant Sciences Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0449-092X
Gaurav D MoghePlant Biology Section School of Integrative Plant Sciences Cornell University Ithaca New York 14853 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-064X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in sequencing and informatic technologies have led to a deluge of publicly available genomic data. While it is now relatively easy to sequence, assemble, and identify genic regions in diploid plant genomes, functional annotation of these genes is still a challenge. Over the past decade, there has been a steady increase in studies utilizing machine learning algorithms for various aspects of functional prediction, because these algorithms are able to integrate large amounts of heterogeneous data and detect patterns inconspicuous through rule-based approaches. The goal of this review is to introduce experimental plant biologists to machine learning, by describing how it is currently being used in gene function prediction to gain novel biological insights. In this review, we discuss specific applications of machine learning in identifying structural features in sequenced genomes, predicting interactions between different cellular components, and predicting gene function and organismal phenotypes. Finally, we also propose strategies for stimulating functional discovery using machine learning-based approaches in plants.

Indexed as

big databioinformaticsgene functionmachine learningpredictive genomics

Identifiers

PMID32765975
PMCPMC7394712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.