ArticleApplications in plant sciences2020
Super resolution for root imaging.
Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Root-Specific Signal Modules Mediating Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Fruit Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Maize Seedling Growth and Hormone Response Assays Using the Rolled Towel Method.Current protocols · 2022Article
- Root system architecture and environmental flux analysis in mature crops using 3D root mesocosms.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Instance segmentation for the fine detection of crop and weed plants by precision agricultural robots.Applications in plant sciences · 2020Article
- Super resolution for root imaging.Applications in plant sciences · 2020Article
- High-ThroughputFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
premiseHigh-resolution cameras are very helpful for plant phenotyping as their images enable tasks such as target vs. background discrimination and the measurement and analysis of fine above-ground plant attributes. However, the acquisition of high-resolution images of plant roots is more challenging than above-ground data collection. An effective super-resolution (SR) algorithm is therefore needed for overcoming the resolution limitations of sensors, reducing storage space requirements, and boosting the performance of subsequent analyses.
methodsWe propose an SR framework for enhancing images of plant roots using convolutional neural networks. We compare three alternatives for training the SR model: (i) training with non-plant-root images, (ii) training with plant-root images, and (iii) pretraining the model with non-plant-root images and fine-tuning with plant-root images. The architectures of the SR models were based on two state-of-the-art deep learning approaches: a fast SR convolutional neural network and an SR generative adversarial network.
resultsIn our experiments, we observed that the SR models improved the quality of low-resolution images of plant roots in an unseen data set in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio. We used a collection of publicly available data sets to demonstrate that the SR models outperform the basic bicubic interpolation, even when trained with non-root data sets. DISCUSSION: The incorporation of a deep learning-based SR model in the imaging process enhances the quality of low-resolution images of plant roots. We demonstrate that SR preprocessing boosts the performance of a machine learning system trained to separate plant roots from their background. Our segmentation experiments also show that high performance on this task can be achieved independently of the signal-to-noise ratio. We therefore conclude that the quality of the image enhancement depends on the desired application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.