Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32765959›Full record

ReviewAging and disease2020

COVID 19 - Clinical Picture in the Elderly Population: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska, Salwan R Al-Saad, Lukasz M Karbowski, Michal Chojnicki, Slawomir Tobis, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging and disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska1Geriatrics Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Salwan R Al-Saad1Geriatrics Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Lukasz M Karbowski1Geriatrics Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Michal Chojnicki2Department of Biology and Environmental Protection, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Slawomir Tobis4Occupational Therapy Unit, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis1Geriatrics Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 tendency to affect the older individuals more severely, raises the need for a concise summary isolating this age population. Analysis of clinical features in light of most recently published data allows for improved understanding, and better clinical judgement. A thorough search was performed to collect all articles published from 1st of January to 1st of June 2020, using the keywords

Indexed as

clinical featuresCOVID-19elderlyolder individualsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32765959
PMCPMC7390523
OpenAlexW3046683917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.