Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32765886›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2020

The use of automated pupillometry to assess cerebral autoregulation: a retrospective study.

Armin Quispe Cornejo, Carla Sofía Fernandes Vilarinho, Ilaria Alice Crippa, Lorenzo Peluso, Lorenzo Calabrò, Jean-Louis Vincent, Jacques Creteur, Fabio Silvio Taccone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reliability and validity of the mean flow index (Mx) for assessing cerebral autoregulation in humans: A systematic review of the methodology.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Armin Quispe CornejoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Carla Sofía Fernandes VilarinhoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Ilaria Alice CrippaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Lorenzo PelusoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6885-5353
Lorenzo CalabròDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Jacques CreteurDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Erasmus Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically ill patients are at high risk of developing neurological complications. Among all the potential aetiologies, brain hypoperfusion has been advocated as one of the potential mechanisms. Impairment of cerebral autoregulation (CAR) can result in brain hypoperfusion. However, assessment of CAR is difficult at bedside. We aimed to evaluate whether the automated pupillometer might be able to detect impaired CAR in critically ill patients.

methodsWe included 92 patients in this retrospective observational study; 52 were septic. CAR was assessed using the Mxa index, which is the correlation index between continuous recording of cerebral blood flow velocities using the transcranial Doppler and invasive arterial blood pressure over 8 ± 2 min. Impaired CAR was defined as an Mxa > 0.3. Automated pupillometer (Neuroptics, Irvine, CA, USA) was used to assess the pupillary light reflex concomitantly to the CAR assessment.

resultsThe median Mxa was 0.33 in the whole cohort (0.33 in septic patients and 0.31 in the non-septic patients;

conclusionsAutomated pupillometry cannot predict CAR indices such as Mxa in a heterogeneous population of critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Brain monitoringCerebral autoregulationPupillometrySepsis

Identifiers

PMID32765886
PMCPMC7395368
OpenAlexW3046787868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.